Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33433135›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2021

Effect of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for refractory and treatment-naive diabetic macular edema in Taiwanese patients.

Jia-Kang Wang, Tzu-Lun Huang, Yung-Ray Hsu, Pei-Yao Chang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. To do one and to get more: Part I. Diabetes and bone.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jia-Kang WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC.
Tzu-Lun HuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC.
Yung-Ray HsuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC.
Pei-Yao ChangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC.
Asia Eastern University of Science and Technology · TWFar Eastern Memorial Hospital · TWNational Taiwan University · TWYuan Ze University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDexamethasone (DEX) implant has been shown to improve visual and anatomic function in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of DEX implant between refractory and naive eyes with DME.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed data from pseudophakic patients with center-involved DME who received DEX implant (1 + as needed retreatment) from May 2015 to May 2017. Baseline clinical characteristics, changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Adverse events were recorded.

resultsThirty-four eyes of 31 patients refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents and 41 eyes of 38 treatment-naive patients were reviewed. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups (p > 0.05). In the refractory eyes, significant improvements in both BCVA and CFT were observed at 1 month post DEX implant and sustained throughout 6 months. Mean change from baseline in BCVA at 6 months was -0.17 ± 0.35 logMAR (7.29 ± 16.22 letters) and 155.44 ± 112.67 μm in CFT. Similar trends of improvement were seen in treatment-naive eyes; however, the visual improvement (-0.30 ± 0.29 logMAR [16.42 ± 14.38 letters]) was significantly better than the refractory group, with significantly less injections (1.54 ± 0.49 versus 1.82 ± 0.38, p = 0.007). Between-group changes in CFT were comparable. No serious ocular complications occurred, and about a quarter of the patients had elevated intraocular pressures that were manageable with topical medications.

conclusionTo our knowledge, this was the first study comparing DEX implant between treatment-naive and refractory Asian patients with DME. Intravitreal DEX implant can effectively treat refractory and treatment-naive patients with DME. In addition, superior visual outcomes were observed in the naive group comparing to the refractory group following DEX implant treatment in Taiwanese pseudophakic eyes with DME.

Indexed as

Diabetes ComplicationsIntravitreal InjectionsAgedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsDexamethasoneFemaleHumansMacular EdemaMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTaiwanTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory AgentsDexamethasone

Identifiers

PMID33433135
PMCPMC12965992
OpenAlexW3120192188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.