Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33432717›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2021

Feasibility of ecological momentary assessment to study depressive symptoms among cancer caregivers.

Kelly M Shaffer, Philip I Chow, Jillian V Glazer, Tri Le, Matthew J Reilley, Mark J Jameson, Lee M Ritterband

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hospice Family Caregivers' Uncertainty, Burden, and Unmet Needs in Prospective Audio Diaries.Journal of hospice and palliative nursing : JHPN : the official journal of the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kelly M ShafferDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, Center for Behavioral Health and Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9749-8006
Philip I ChowDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, Center for Behavioral Health and Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6428-1540
Jillian V GlazerDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, Center for Behavioral Health and Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Tri LeEmily Couric Clinical Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Matthew J ReilleyEmily Couric Clinical Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Mark J JamesonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Lee M RitterbandDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, Center for Behavioral Health and Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

The integrated Translational Health Research Institute of Virginia (iTHRIV): Using Data to Improve HealthUL1TR003015 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BROWN, DONALD E, JOHNSTON, KAREN C. · 2019 to 2023
$20.3M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR003016 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI PAPIN, JASON, WORRALL, BRADFORD B · 2019 to 2023
$3.9M
Interdisciplinary Training in Systems & Biomolecular Data ScienceT32GM145443 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Kevin A Janes, Jason Papin · 2022 to 2026
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003016NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003015NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEcological momentary assessment (EMA) may help with the development of more targeted interventions for caregivers' depression, yet the use of this method has been limited among cancer caregivers. This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of EMA among cancer caregivers and the use of EMA data to understand affective correlates of caregiver depressive symptoms.

methodsCaregivers (N = 25) completed a depressive symptom assessment (Patient Health Questionnaire-8) and then received eight EMA survey prompts per day for 7 days. EMA surveys assessed affect on the orthogonal dimensions of valence and arousal. Participants completed feedback surveys regarding the EMA protocol at the conclusion of the week-long study.

resultsOf 32 caregivers approached, 25 enrolled and participated (78%), which exceeded the a priori feasibility cutoff of 55%. The prompt completion rate (59%, or 762 of 1,286 issued) did not exceed the a priori cutoff of 65%, although completion was not related to caregivers' age, employment status, physical health quality of life, caregiving stress, or depressive symptoms or the patients' care needs (ps > 0.22). Caregivers' feedback about their study experience was generally positive. Mixed-effects location scale modeling showed caregivers' higher depressive symptoms were related to overall higher reported negative affect and lower positive affect, but not to affective variability.

conclusionsFindings from this feasibility study refute potential concerns that an EMA design is too burdensome for distressed caregivers. Clinically, findings suggest the potential importance of not only strategies to reduce overall levels of negative affect, but also to increase opportunities for positive affect.

Indexed as

CaregiversNeoplasmsDepressionEcological Momentary AssessmentFeasibility StudiesHumansQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnairesaffectcancercaregiversdepressionecological momentary assessmentoncologypsycho-oncology

Identifiers

PMID33432717
PMCPMC8931849
OpenAlexW3118654848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.