Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33432497›Full record

ReviewCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2021

Pupillometry in perioperative medicine: a narrative review.

Senthil Packiasabapathy, Valluvan Rangasamy, Senthilkumar Sadhasivam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Ultrasound Measurement of Pupillary Dilation Reflex During Induction of General Anesthesia Using Sufentanil: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Senthil PackiasabapathyDepartment of Anesthesia, Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, RH 2835, 705 Riley Hospital Drive, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Valluvan RangasamyDepartment of Anesthesia, Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, RH 2835, 705 Riley Hospital Drive, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Senthilkumar SadhasivamDepartment of Anesthesia, Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, RH 2835, 705 Riley Hospital Drive, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. ssadhasivam@iuhealth.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3689-8313

Funding

Pharmacogenetics of Oxycodone, Personalized Care and Persistent Surgical PainR01HD089458 · NICHD · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SADHASIVAM, SENTHILKUMAR · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
Bedside prediction of opioid-induced respiratory depression in children with pupillometryR21HD094311 · NICHD · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SADHASIVAM, SENTHILKUMAR · 2018 to 2019
$433k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD089458NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD094311NIH HHS R01 HD089458NIH HHS R21 HD094311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePupillometry is a technique for objective quantification of nociception that takes into account the central processing of noxious stimuli and its sympathetic response. This narrative review provides an overview of the physiology of the pupil, the principles of pupillometry, and its potential application in the perioperative environment, especially in nociception monitoring and quantifying responses to opioids. SOURCE: Relevant articles, including reports of original investigation, review articles, and meta-analyses were identified from searches of PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Articles that described pupillary physiology and pupillometry, along with original research reports of the application of pupillometry in perioperative and critical care environment were used to synthesize a narrative review. PRINCIPAL

findingsPupillometry is emerging as an objective measure of nociception, especially in patients under general anesthesia, children, non-verbal patients, and critically ill patients who cannot effectively communicate ongoing pain. Portable automated pupillometers have made accurate quantification of pupillary reflexes, including light reflex and dilatation reflex, possible. This technique has been successfully studied in the perioperative setting for a number of applications, including quantification of nociception, response to analgesia, and assessing efficacy of regional blocks. Pupillary oscillations have shown promise in assessing central opioid effects. Pupillometers can also accurately quantify light reflexes during the neurologic evaluation of critically ill patients.

conclusionsPupillometry is an easy to use non-invasive bedside technique to quantify nociception and monitor opioid effects. It has the potential to personalize pain management in perioperative and intensive care unit environments. Additional studies are needed to further understand the utility of pupillometry in this context.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaPerioperative MedicineChildCritical CareHumansPupilReflex, Pupillarypain monitorpupillary reflex dilatationpupillometerquantitative pupillometry

Identifiers

PMID33432497
PMCPMC7935761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.