Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33432476›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2021

Management of Difficult-to-Treat Warts: Traditional and New Approaches.

Peter C Friedman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter C FriedmanThe Skin Center Dermatology Group, 200 E Eckerson Road, New City, NY, 10956, USA. pbc9@columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1276-7300

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Warts are regularly treated by dermatologists, and while many respond readily to first-line treatments, others may represent a therapeutic challenge. Large, deep, numerous, and extensive warts; treatment-resistant lesions with higher risk for side effects, such as hypopigmentation; or patients unable to tolerate or comply with our treatment regimen, may need alternative treatment options. In this work we review the characteristics of select modalities that should be considered for difficult-to-treat warts. We discuss efficacy and tolerability data as well as practical features that can guide us to select the best treatment for every scenario. Novel approaches, still in an investigational phase, are also discussed to illustrate potential future directions of wart treatment.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAntiviral AgentsCombined Modality TherapyCryosurgeryHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunotherapyInjections, IntralesionalKeratolytic AgentsMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineNitric OxidePapillomavirus VaccinesPhotochemotherapySalicylic AcidTreatment OutcomeWartsAntiviral AgentsImmunologic FactorsKeratolytic AgentsMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineNitric OxidePapillomavirus VaccinesSalicylic Acid

Identifiers

PMID33432476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.