Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33432468›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2022

Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Among Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy.

R Samant, E Cisa-Paré, K Balchin, J Renaud, L Bunch, P Wheatley-Price, A McNeil, S Murray, J Meng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Satisfaction with radiotherapy care among cancer patients treated in Germany-secondary analysis of a large multicenter study.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Smile InHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

R SamantThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada. rsamant@toh.ca.
E Cisa-ParéThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9270-0383
K BalchinThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada.
J RenaudThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada.
L BunchThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada.
P Wheatley-PriceThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada.
A McNeilThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada.
S MurrayThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada.
J MengThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The patient-provider relationship is a key driver of patient satisfaction as it relates to overall healthcare experience. We surveyed patients undergoing radiation therapy to determine what they consider to be the most valued qualities in their interactions with the healthcare team. An ethics-approved 35-item patient satisfaction survey was developed in-house to gain insights on patients' perception of their relationship with the healthcare team throughout their cancer journey. There were 199 completed survey, median age 68 years, 54% women and 45% men. Almost all (95%) "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that their physicians had been sensitive and compassionate. Over 90% felt that they received adequate explanations about their treatment, and had their questions answered. The vast majority (93%) felt included in the decision-making process. Patients reported the 5 most highly rated qualities among their healthcare providers (HCPs) as knowledge, kindness, honesty, good communication, and a cheerful attitude. Overall satisfaction was high but areas for improvement were identified including being offered future appointments for further discussion, more information about clinical trials, other treatments, and community resources. Patients noted their HCPs tended to focus on the physical and emotional needs of patients, but spiritual and cultural needs were rarely addressed. Patients receiving radiotherapy reported high rates of satisfaction across many aspects of their care. These findings also reinforce the different aspects of holistic care that can be improved, and serve as a reminder to clinicians that patients perceive their role as more than just that of a medical expert.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPatient SatisfactionAgedCommunicationFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleProfessional-Patient RelationsHCP interactionPatient-centered carePatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID33432468
PMCPMC9550720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.