Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33432365›Full record

ArticleOncology reports2021

Immunomodulatory potential of anticancer therapy composed of methotrexate nanoconjugate and dendritic cell‑based vaccines in murine colon carcinoma.

Agnieszka Szczygieł, Natalia Anger-Góra, Katarzyna Węgierek-Ciura, Jagoda Mierzejewska, Joanna Rossowska, Tomasz M Goszczyński, Marta Świtalska, Elżbieta Pajtasz-Piasecka

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Agnieszka SzczygiełLudwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, 53‑114 Wroclaw, Poland.
Natalia Anger-GóraLudwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, 53‑114 Wroclaw, Poland.
Katarzyna Węgierek-CiuraLudwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, 53‑114 Wroclaw, Poland.
Jagoda MierzejewskaLudwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, 53‑114 Wroclaw, Poland.
Joanna RossowskaLudwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, 53‑114 Wroclaw, Poland.
Tomasz M GoszczyńskiLudwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, 53‑114 Wroclaw, Poland.
Marta ŚwitalskaLudwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, 53‑114 Wroclaw, Poland.
Elżbieta Pajtasz-PiaseckaLudwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, 53‑114 Wroclaw, Poland.
Ludwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemotherapy with low‑molecular weight compounds, despite elimination of cancer cells, entails adverse effects. To overcome this disadvantage, innovative drug delivery systems are being developed, including conjugation of macromolecular carriers with therapeutics, e.g. a nanoconjugate of hydroxyethyl starch and methotrexate (HES‑MTX). The purpose of the present study was to determine whether HES‑MTX, applied as a chemotherapeutic, is able to modulate the immune response and support the antitumor response generated by dendritic cells (DCs) used subsequently as immunotherapeutic vaccines. Therefore, MTX or HES‑MTX was administered, as sole treatment or combined with DC‑based vaccines, to MC38 colon carcinoma tumor‑bearing mice. Alterations in antitumor immune response were evaluated by multiparameter flow cytometry analyses and functional assays. The results demonstrated that the nanoconjugate possesses greater immunomodulatory potential than MTX as reflected by changes in the landscape of immune cells infiltrating the tumor and increased cytotoxicity of splenic lymphocytes. In contrast to MTX, therapy with HES‑MTX as sole treatment or combined with DC‑based vaccines, contributed to significant tumor growth inhibition. However, only treatment with HES‑MTX and DC‑based vaccines activated the systemic specific antitumor response. In conclusion, due to its immunomodulatory properties, the HES‑MTX nanoconjugate could become a potent anticancer agent used in both chemo‑ and chemoimmunotherapeutic treatment schemes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCancer VaccinesCarcinomaCell Line, TumorColonColonic NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDendritic CellsDisease Models, AnimalDrug CarriersFemaleHumansHydroxyethyl Starch DerivativesIntestinal MucosaMethotrexateMiceCancer VaccinesDrug CarriersHydroxyethyl Starch DerivativesMethotrexateNanoconjugateschemotherapycolon carcinomadendritic cellsimmunotherapyMC38methotrexatenanoconjugate

Identifiers

PMID33432365
PMCPMC7859925
OpenAlexW3119711137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.