Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33432167›Full record

Trial reportEye (London, England)2021

Botulinum neurotoxin injections in essential infantile esotropia-a comparative study with surgery in large-angle deviations.

I Mayet, N Ally, H D Alli, M Tikly, S Williams

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Eye (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of botulinum toxin injection versus bilateral medial rectus recession for comitant esotropia: a meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Botulinum toxin for the treatment of strabismus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Interventions for infantile esotropia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

I MayetDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. eyemay.im@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1720-941X
N AllyDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6676-9352
H D AlliDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
M TiklyDepartment of Rheumatology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
S WilliamsDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4479-8638
University of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare botulinum neurotoxin (BNT) injections to surgery as first-line therapy in large-angle essential infantile esotropia (IE). PATIENTS AND

methodsChildren between the ages 6 months and 6 years with IE of ≥40 prism dioptres (PD) were randomised to either a maximum of three BNT injections or surgical intervention of bimedial rectus muscle recession for angles ≤60 PD and augmented with BNT injection in angles >60 PD. Time taken for each procedure was documented. Orthophoria or misalignment of ≤10 PD was regarded as a complete response (CR). Follow-up visits were done at 3, 6, 12 and 24 weeks.

resultsMean (SD) age and baseline angle of esotropia were 26.9 (14.5) months and 61.9 PD (12.8), respectively, for the overall cohort. The proportion of children who achieved CR was significantly higher in the surgery arm compared to the BNT injection arm (OR = 4.01, 95% CI 1.74-9.22) but the time taken was six times longer (p < 0.0001). In the BNT arm, 55.2% of children aged ≤24 months and 16% of children >24 months achieved CR. In children with esotropia ≤60 PD, CR was achieved in 50% while those with esotropia >60 PD CR was achieved in 25%.

conclusionSurgery remains the gold standard for treatment of esotropia but BNT injection is a safe and effective alternative in children ≤24 m and with smaller angles of esotropia ≤60 PD in resource-limited centres.

Indexed as

Botulinum ToxinsEsotropiaChildHumansInfantNeurotoxinsOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresVision, BinocularBotulinum ToxinsNeurotoxins

Identifiers

PMID33432167
PMCPMC8526699
OpenAlexW3120684783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.