ArticleScientific reports2021
Smoking, urinary cotinine levels and incidence of visual impairment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The correlation between smoking and preoperative deep venous thrombosis after hip fracture in geriatric patients: a propensity score-matched study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- An analysis of the global, regional, and national epidemiology and trends of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias linked to smoking from 1990 to 2021 and projections to 2050.Tobacco induced diseases · 2025Article
- Personality traits and the risk of sensory impairment: Evidence from the National Health and Aging Trends Study.Journal of psychosomatic research · 2023Article
- Self-reported and cotinine-verified smoking and increased risk of incident hearing loss.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Rasagiline Pharmacokinetics in CYP1A2 Variant Healthy Smokers & Non-smokers in Different Doses.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
- Enzyme ChE, cholinergic therapy and molecular docking: Significant considerations and future perspectives.International journal of immunopathology and pharmacologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The longitudinal relationship between smoking status and risk of developing visual impairment (VI) remains unclear. We examined the relationship of smoking status and urinary cotinine level, an objective measure of smoking, with incidence of VI. This cohort study included 279,069 individuals free of VI who were followed for up to 8.8 years (median 4.8 years). VI was defined as when bilateral visual acuity was worse than 0.5 (cutoffs of 0.3 Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution). During 1,324,429.8 person-years of follow-up, 7852 participants developed new-onset bilateral VI. Self-reported current smoking status was associated with increased risk of developing VI in both men and women, with a stronger association in women (P for interaction = 0.01). Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for incident VI comparing current smokers to never-smokers were 1.14 (1.04-1.25) in men and 1.52 (1.28-1.80) in women. Urinary cotinine levels of ≥ 100 ng/ml were significantly associated with increased risk of incident VI, and these associations remained when introducing changes in urinary cotinine and other confounders during follow-up as time-varying covariates. Cigarette smoking assessed based on self-report and urinary cotinine level was associated with increased incidence of VI. Our findings identify smoking as an independent risk factor for VI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.