Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33431972›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

The relationship between reflex eye realignment and the percept of single vision in young children.

Kimberly Meier, Deanna L Lundell, Eric S Seemiller, Deborah Giaschi, Laurie M Wilcox, T Rowan Candy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Limitations on Vergence Responses to Naturalistic Images Resulting From Simulated Central Scotomas and Defocused Peripheral Retina.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The role of binocular vision in the control and development of visually guided upper limb movements.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kimberly MeierDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, 119A Guthrie Hall Box 351525, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. kimmeier@uw.edu.
Deanna L LundellSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, Indiana University, 800 E Atwater Avenue, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Eric S SeemillerSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, Indiana University, 800 E Atwater Avenue, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Deborah GiaschiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3V4, Canada.
Laurie M WilcoxDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Vision Research, York University, 4700 Keele St, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.
T Rowan CandySchool of Optometry and Vision Science, Indiana University, 800 E Atwater Avenue, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.

Funding

Accommodation and Defocus in the Infant Visual SystemR01EY014460 · NEI · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI CANDY, T ROWAN · 2003 to 2025
$7.5M
Core Support for Vision Research at Indiana UniversityP30EY019008 · NEI · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI BURNS, STEPHEN A · 2009 to 2013
$2.1M
Short-Term Research Training For Optometry StudentsT35EY013937 · NEI · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, DONALD T · 2001 to 2021
$717k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY019008NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014460NEI NIH HHS T35 EY013937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective binocular vision is dependent on both motor and perceptual function. Young children undergo development of both components while interacting with their dynamic three-dimensional environment. When this development fails, eye misalignment and double vision may result. We compared the range of image disparities over which young children display reflex motor realignment of their eyes with the range over which they report a single versus double percept. In response to step changes in the disparity of a 2.2° wide stimulus, 5-year-olds generated an adult-like reflex vergence velocity tuning function peaking at 2° of disparity, with a mean latency of 210 ms. On average, they reported double vision for stimulus disparities of 3° and larger, compared to 1° in adult reports. Three-year-olds also generated reflex vergence tuning functions peaking at approximately 2° of disparity, but their percepts could not be assessed. These data suggest that, by age 5, reflex eye realignment responses and percepts driven by these brief stimuli are tightly coordinated in space and time to permit robust binocular function around the point of fixation. Importantly, the plastic neural processes maintaining this tight coordination during growth control the stability of visual information driving learning during childhood.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolDiplopiaEye MovementsFixation, OcularHumansPhotic StimulationReaction TimeReflexSaccadesVision, BinocularVision DisparityVision, OcularVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID33431972
PMCPMC7801643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.