Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33431959›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Oilbirds disperse large seeds at longer distance than extinct megafauna.

Pablo R Stevenson, Laura Cardona, Sasha Cárdenas, Andrés Link

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pablo R StevensonLaboratorio de Ecología de Bosques Tropicales Y Primatología, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Los Andes, Carrera 1 No. 18A-10, Bogotá, Colombia. pstevens@uniandes.edu.co.
Laura CardonaLaboratorio de Ecología de Bosques Tropicales Y Primatología, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Los Andes, Carrera 1 No. 18A-10, Bogotá, Colombia.
Sasha CárdenasLaboratorio de Ecología de Bosques Tropicales Y Primatología, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Los Andes, Carrera 1 No. 18A-10, Bogotá, Colombia.
Andrés LinkLaboratorio de Ecología de Bosques Tropicales Y Primatología, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Los Andes, Carrera 1 No. 18A-10, Bogotá, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extinction of megafauna in the Neotropics is thought to have reduced the potential of large seeds to be dispersed over long distances by endozoochory (ingestion by animals), but some seed dispersal systems have not been considered. We describe the role of oilbirds (Steatornis caripensis) as seed dispersers, in terms of seed width and dispersal distance (using GPS tracking devices), and we compare with data reported for other animals. Oilbirds dispersed seeds up to 29 mm wide, with a mean dispersal distance of 10.1 km (range 0-47.6 km). Some components of seed dispersal by oilbirds are outliers compared to that of other frugivores, such as the relationship between maximum seed width and body weight (however, few other extant specialized frugivores are also outliers). Estimates of mean dispersal distance by oilbirds are the largest reported, and we confirm that some living frugivores currently fulfil roles of seed dispersers and ecosystem services previously assumed to be only performed by extinct species.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionBirdsBody WeightChiropteraEcosystemElephantsExtinction, BiologicalFeeding BehaviorFishesFruitHaplorhiniSeed DispersalStrigiformes

Identifiers

PMID33431959
PMCPMC7801487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.