Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33431653›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Equity for women and underrepresented minorities in STEM: Graduate experiences and career plans in chemistry.

Jean Stockard, Celeste M Rohlfing, Geraldine L Richmond

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Leveraging Maker Learning in STEM to Promote Children's Interest in Cancer Research: A Pilot Program.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Discipline-Based Diversity Research in Chemistry.Accounts of chemical research · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jean StockardDepartment of Planning, Public Policy and Management, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6134-7233
Celeste M RohlfingCommittee on the Advancement of Women Chemists (COACh), University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.
Geraldine L RichmondDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 richmond@uoregon.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0876-5262

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent events prompted scientists in the United States and throughout the world to consider how systematic racism affects the scientific enterprise. This paper provides evidence of inequities related to race-ethnicity and gender in graduate school experiences and career plans of PhD students in the top 100 ranked departments in one science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) discipline, chemistry. Mixed-model regression analyses were used to examine factors that might moderate these differences. The results show that graduate students who identified as a member of a racial/ethnic group traditionally underrepresented in chemistry (underrepresented minorities, URM) were significantly less likely than other students to report that their financial support was sufficient to meet their needs. They were also less likely to report having supportive relationships with peers and postdocs. Women, and especially URM women, were significantly less likely to report supportive relationships with advisors. Despite their more negative experiences in graduate school, students who identified as URM expressed greater commitment to finishing their degree and staying in the field. When there was at least one faculty member within their departments who also identified as URM they were also more likely than other students to aspire to a university professorship with an emphasis on research. Men were significantly more likely than women to express strong commitment to finishing the PhD and remaining in chemistry, but this difference was stronger in top-ranked departments. Men were also more likely than women to aspire to a professorship with an emphasis on research, and this difference remained when individual and departmental-level variables were controlled.

Indexed as

graduate student experienceunderrepresented minoritiesURMwomen

Identifiers

PMID33431653
PMCPMC7848687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.