Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33431382›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2021

Time from presentation to pre-diagnostic chest X-ray in patients with symptomatic lung cancer: a cohort study using electronic patient records from English primary care.

Kirsten D Arendse, Fiona M Walter, Mark Pilling, Yin Zhou, Willie Hamilton, Garth Funston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Identifying opportunities for timely diagnosis of bladder and renal cancer via abnormal blood tests: a longitudinal linked data study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kirsten D ArendsePrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Fiona M WalterPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Mark PillingPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Yin ZhouWellcome Trust primary care doctoral fellow.
Willie HamiltonUniversity of Exeter, Exeter.ORCID 0000-0003-1611-1373
Garth FunstonPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational guidelines in England recommend prompt chest X-ray (within 14 days) in patients presenting in general practice with unexplained symptoms of possible lung cancer, including persistent cough, shortness of breath, or weight loss.

aimTo examine time to chest X-ray in symptomatic patients in English general practice before lung cancer diagnosis, and explore demographical variation. DESIGN AND

settingRetrospective cohort study using routinely collected general practice, cancer registry, and imaging data from England.

methodPatients with lung cancer who presented symptomatically in general practice in the year pre-diagnosis and who had a pre-diagnostic chest X-ray were included. Time from presentation to chest X-ray (presentation-test interval) was determined and intervals classified based on national guideline recommendations as concordant (≤14 days) or non-concordant (>14 days). Variation in intervals was examined by age, sex, smoking status, and deprivation.

resultsIn a cohort of 2102 patients with lung cancer, the median presentation-test interval was 49 (interquartile range [IQR] 5-172) days. Of these, 727 (35%) patients had presentation-test intervals of ≤14 days (median 1 [IQR 0-6] day) and 1375 (65%) had presentation-test intervals of >14 days (median 128 [IQR 52-231] days). Intervals were longer among patients who smoke (equivalent to 63% longer than non-smokers;

conclusionIn symptomatic primary care patients who underwent chest X-ray before lung cancer diagnosis, only 35% were tested within the timeframe recommended by national guidelines. Patients who smoke, older patients, and females experienced longer intervals. These findings could help guide initiatives aimed at improving timely lung cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsLung NeoplasmsAdultCohort StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansMalePrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesX-Rayschest X-rayclinical practice guidelinediagnostic intervalsearly diagnosislung cancer

Identifiers

PMID33431382
PMCPMC7805412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.