Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33431087›Full record

Trial reportPsychological medicine2022

The effect of sertraline on emotional processing: secondary analyses of the PANDA randomised controlled trial.

Norin Ahmed, Jessica K Bone, Gemma Lewis, Nick Freemantle, Catherine J Harmer, Larisa Duffy, Glyn Lewis

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychological medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Norin AhmedDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Faculty of Brain Sciences, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8798-5217
Jessica K BoneDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Faculty of Brain Sciences, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6019-7066
Gemma LewisDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Faculty of Brain Sciences, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6666-3681
Nick FreemantleInstitute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5807-5740
Catherine J HarmerUniversity Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1609-8335
Larisa DuffyDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Faculty of Brain Sciences, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0093-3877
Glyn LewisDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Faculty of Brain Sciences, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5205-8245
Faculty (United Kingdom) · GBMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0610-10048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccording to the cognitive neuropsychological model, antidepressants reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety by increasing positive relative to negative information processing. Most studies of whether antidepressants alter emotional processing use small samples of healthy individuals, which lead to low statistical power and selection bias and are difficult to generalise to clinical practice. We tested whether the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) sertraline altered recall of positive and negative information in a large randomised controlled trial (RCT) of patients with depressive symptoms recruited from primary care.

methodsThe PANDA trial was a pragmatic multicentre double-blind RCT comparing sertraline with placebo. Memory for personality descriptors was tested at baseline and 2 and 6 weeks after randomisation using a computerised emotional categorisation task followed by a free recall. We measured the number of positive and negative words correctly recalled (hits). Poisson mixed models were used to analyse longitudinal associations between treatment allocation and hits.

resultsA total of 576 participants (88% of those randomised) completed the recall task at 2 and 6 weeks. We found no evidence that positive or negative hits differed according to treatment allocation at 2 or 6 weeks (adjusted positive hits ratio = 0.97, 95% CI 0.90-1.05,

conclusionsIn the largest individual placebo-controlled trial of an antidepressant not funded by the pharmaceutical industry, we found no evidence that sertraline altered positive or negative recall early in treatment. These findings challenge some assumptions of the cognitive neuropsychological model of antidepressant action.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsSertralineDepressionEmotionsHumansSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAntidepressive AgentsSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSertralineAntidepressantscognitive neuropsychological modeldepressionemotional processingmemoryrecall

Identifiers

PMID33431087
PMCPMC9647512
OpenAlexW3119359577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.