Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33431061›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2021

Predictors of institutional delivery service utilization among women of reproductive age in Senegal: a population-based study.

Betregiorgis Zegeye, Bright Opoku Ahinkorah, Dina Idriss-Wheelr, Olanrewaju Oladimeji, Comfort Z Olorunsaiye, Sanni Yaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Betregiorgis ZegeyeHaSET Maternal and Child Health Research Program, Shewarobit Field Office, Shewarobit, Ethiopia.
Bright Opoku AhinkorahThe Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research (ACPPHR), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Dina Idriss-WheelrInterdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Olanrewaju OladimejiDepartment of Public Health, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, Eastern Cape, South Africa.
Comfort Z OlorunsaiyeDepartment of Public Health, Arcadia University, Glenside, PA, USA.
Sanni YayaFaculty of Social Sciences, School of International Development and Global Studies, University of Ottawa, 120 University Private, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada. sanni.yaya@uOttawa.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4876-6043

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Senegal, sub-Saharan Africa, many women continue to die from pregnancy and childbirth complications. Even though health facility delivery is a key intervention to reducing maternal death, utilization is low. There is a dearth of evidence on determinants of health facility delivery in Senegal. Therefore, this study investigated the predictors of health facility-based delivery utilization in Senegal.

methodsData from the 2017 Senegal Continuous Survey were extracted for this study, and approximately 11,487 ever-married women aged 15-49 years participated. Chi-square test was used to select significant variables and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify statistically significant predictors at a 95% confidence interval with a 0.05 p-value using Stata version 14 software.

resultsFacility-based delivery utilization was 77.7% and the main predictors were maternal educational status (primary school Adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] = 1.44, 95% CI; 1.14-1.83; secondary school aOR = 1.62, 95% CI; 1.17-2.25), husband's educational status (primary school aOR = 1.65, 95% CI; 1.24-2.20, secondary school aOR = 2.17, 95% CI; 1.52-3.10), maternal occupation (agricultural-self-employed aOR = 0.77, 95% CI; 0.62-0.96), ethnicity (Poular aOR = 0.74, 95% CI; 0.56-0.97), place of residence (rural aOR = 0.57, 95% CI; 0.43, 0.74), media exposure (yes aOR = 1.26, 95% CI; 1.02-1.57), economic status (richest aOR = 5.27, 95% CI; 2.85-9.73), parity (seven and above aOR =0.46, 95% CI; 0.34-0.62), wife beating attitude (refuse aOR =1.23, 95% CI; 1.05-1.44) and skilled antenatal care (ANC) (yes aOR = 4.34, 95% CI; 3.10-6.08).

conclusionUptake of health facility delivery services was seen among women who were educated, exposed to media, wealthy, against wife-beating, attended ANC by skilled attendants and had educated husbands. On the other hand, women from ethnic groups like Poular, those working in agricultural activities, living in rural setting, and those who had more delivery history were less likely to deliver at a health facility. Therefore, there is the need to empower women by encouraging them to use skilled ANC services in order for them to gain the requisite knowledge they need to enhance their utilization of health facility delivery, whiles at the same time, removing socio-economic barriers to access to health facility delivery that occur from low education, poverty and rural dwelling.

Indexed as

Global healthInstitutional deliveryMaternal healthReproductive ageSenegalSub-Saharan AfricaWomen

Identifiers

PMID33431061
PMCPMC7798284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.