Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33431055›Full record

ArticlePorcine health management2021

Effect of spray-dried porcine plasma in peripartum sow feed on subsequent litter size.

Joe Crenshaw, Laura Lafoz Del Río, Luis Sanjoaquin, Simon Tibble, Francesc González-Solé, David Solà-Oriol, Carmen Rodriguez, Joy Campbell, Javier Polo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porcine health management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Spray-Dried Animal Plasma as a Multifaceted Ingredient in Pet Food.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Joe CrenshawAPC LLC, 2425 SE Oak Tree Court, Ankeny, IA, 50021, USA. joe.crenshaw@apcproteins.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6704-9373
Laura Lafoz Del RíoThinkinPig, Avda. Gómez Laguna 41, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain.
Luis SanjoaquinThinkinPig, Avda. Gómez Laguna 41, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain.
Simon TibbleAlternative Swine Nutrition (ASN). PL Fraga C/ Comunidad de Murcia parc. LIE 1-03, 22520, Fraga, Spain.
Francesc González-SoléAnimal Nutrition and Welfare Service (SNIBA), Department of Animal and Food Science, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.
David Solà-OriolAnimal Nutrition and Welfare Service (SNIBA), Department of Animal and Food Science, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.
Carmen RodriguezAPC EUROPE, S.L. Avda, Sant Julià 246-258, Pol. Ind. El Congost, E-08403, Granollers, Spain.
Joy CampbellAPC LLC, 2425 SE Oak Tree Court, Ankeny, IA, 50021, USA.
Javier PoloAPC LLC, 2425 SE Oak Tree Court, Ankeny, IA, 50021, USA.
APC Europe (Spain) · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Kinshasa · CD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNutritional strategies for sows designed to reduce peripartum stress are suggested to support postpartum recovery and productivity. Spray-dried plasma (SDP) in sow feed has been reported to benefit sow and litter performance. Stressed animals fed diets with SDP have a more efficient immune response supporting animal recovery and health. The objectives of the present study using 452 sows (147 parity 1 sows, 148 parity 2 sows) were to determine if 0, 0.5 or 2.5% spray-dried porcine plasma (SDPP) in peripartum feed provided from entry in maternity through day 5 of lactation affects sow productivity and serological immune and oxidation status markers around parturition. Post-weaning sow productivity parameters including litter size at the next parturition was evaluated, but peripartum diets were only provided during the first parturition.

resultsIn the first parturition, total born litter size was lower (P <  0.05) especially for sows allotted to the peripartum diet with 2.5% SDPP. Percentage of stillborn pigs decreased quadratically (P <  0.05) for sows fed 0.5% or 2.5% SDPP compared to 0% SDPP in peripartum feed and this result was not affected by total born litter size. Serum glutathione peroxidase activity linearly increased (P <  0.01) with increased dietary SDPP for both prepartum and postpartum sampling periods. In the next parturition, total born pigs from combined data of parity 1 and 2 sows linearly increased (P <  0.05) and live born pigs tended (P = 0.09) to linearly increase as level of SDPP increased and this result was not affected by total born litter size in the first parturition. The change in total and live born pigs from the first to the next parturition linearly (P <  0.01) increased as dietary SDPP increased for parity 1 and 2 sows.

conclusionsThe reduced percentage of stillborn pigs and increased litter size of parity 1 and 2 sows in the next parturition was independent of total born litter size in the first parturition suggesting SDPP in peripartum sow feed may have merit for reducing stillborn pigs and benefit litter size in the next parturition for parity 1 and parity 2 sows.

Indexed as

CytokinesLitter sizeOxidation statusParturitionSowsSpray-dried porcine plasma

Identifiers

PMID33431055
PMCPMC7798288
OpenAlexW3114495806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.