Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33431038›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2020

QSAR-derived affinity fingerprints (part 1): fingerprint construction and modeling performance for similarity searching, bioactivity classification and scaffold hopping.

C Škuta, I Cortés-Ciriano, W Dehaen, P Kříž, G J P van Westen, I V Tetko, A Bender, D Svozil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

C ŠkutaCZ-OPENSCREEN: National Infrastructure for Chemical Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the ASCR, v. v. i., Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5325-4934
I Cortés-CirianoCentre for Molecular Informatics, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2036-494X
W DehaenCZ-OPENSCREEN: National Infrastructure for Chemical Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the ASCR, v. v. i., Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9597-0629
P KřížDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2473-1919
G J P van WestenComputational Drug Discovery, Drug Discovery and Safety, LACDR, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0717-1817
I V TetkoHelmholtz Zentrum Muenchen - German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH) and BIGCHEM GmbH, Ingolstaedter Landstrasse 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6855-0012
A BenderCentre for Molecular Informatics, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6683-7546
D SvozilCZ-OPENSCREEN: National Infrastructure for Chemical Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the ASCR, v. v. i., Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic. daniel.svozil@vscht.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2577-5163

Funding

FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions 238701H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 703543Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic LM2018130Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic RVO 68378050-KAV-NPUI
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An affinity fingerprint is the vector consisting of compound's affinity or potency against the reference panel of protein targets. Here, we present the QAFFP fingerprint, 440 elements long in silico QSAR-based affinity fingerprint, components of which are predicted by Random Forest regression models trained on bioactivity data from the ChEMBL database. Both real-valued (rv-QAFFP) and binary (b-QAFFP) versions of the QAFFP fingerprint were implemented and their performance in similarity searching, biological activity classification and scaffold hopping was assessed and compared to that of the 1024 bits long Morgan2 fingerprint (the RDKit implementation of the ECFP4 fingerprint). In both similarity searching and biological activity classification, the QAFFP fingerprint yields retrieval rates, measured by AUC (~ 0.65 and ~ 0.70 for similarity searching depending on data sets, and ~ 0.85 for classification) and EF5 (~ 4.67 and ~ 5.82 for similarity searching depending on data sets, and ~ 2.10 for classification), comparable to that of the Morgan2 fingerprint (similarity searching AUC of ~ 0.57 and ~ 0.66, and EF5 of ~ 4.09 and ~ 6.41, depending on data sets, classification AUC of ~ 0.87, and EF5 of ~ 2.16). However, the QAFFP fingerprint outperforms the Morgan2 fingerprint in scaffold hopping as it is able to retrieve 1146 out of existing 1749 scaffolds, while the Morgan2 fingerprint reveals only 864 scaffolds.

Indexed as

Affinity fingerprintBioactivity modelingBiological fingerprintQSARScaffold hoppingSimilarity searching

Identifiers

PMID33431038
PMCPMC7260783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.