Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33431016›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2020

QSAR-derived affinity fingerprints (part 2): modeling performance for potency prediction.

Isidro Cortés-Ciriano, Ctibor Škuta, Andreas Bender, Daniel Svozil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Transformational machine learning: Learning how to learn from many related scientific problems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isidro Cortés-CirianoCentre for Molecular Informatics, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK. icortes@ebi.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2036-494X
Ctibor ŠkutaCZ-OPENSCREEN: National Infrastructure for Chemical Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the ASCR, v. v. i., Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5325-4934
Andreas BenderCentre for Molecular Informatics, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6683-7546
Daniel SvozilCZ-OPENSCREEN: National Infrastructure for Chemical Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the ASCR, v. v. i., Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2577-5163

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 703543Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic LM2015063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affinity fingerprints report the activity of small molecules across a set of assays, and thus permit to gather information about the bioactivities of structurally dissimilar compounds, where models based on chemical structure alone are often limited, and model complex biological endpoints, such as human toxicity and in vitro cancer cell line sensitivity. Here, we propose to model in vitro compound activity using computationally predicted bioactivity profiles as compound descriptors. To this aim, we apply and validate a framework for the calculation of QSAR-derived affinity fingerprints (QAFFP) using a set of 1360 QSAR models generated using K

Indexed as

Affinity fingerprintsBioactivity modelingChEMBLCytotoxicityDrug sensitivityDrug sensitivity predictionQSAR

Identifiers

PMID33431016
PMCPMC7339533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.