Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33430882›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2021

Inferential challenges when assessing racial/ethnic health disparities in environmental research.

Tarik Benmarhnia, Anjum Hajat, Jay S Kaufman

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Racial differences in odds of asthma exacerbations among Aspergillus fumigatus-sensitized adults with asthma.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Association between fine particulate matter (PMEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Associations of prenatal ambient air pollution exposures with asthma in middle childhood.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Evaluating Race in Air Pollution and Health Research: Race, PMCurrent environmental health reports · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tarik BenmarhniaDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health & Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. tbenmarhnia@ucsd.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4018-3089
Anjum HajatDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jay S KaufmanDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

XENOBIOTIC BIOTRANSFORMATION AND DISPOSITIONP30ES007033 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Sheela Sathyanarayana · 1995 to 2026
$42.5M
Interaction of Air Pollution and Psychosocial Stress on Cardiovascular Disease.R00ES023498 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HAJAT, ANJUM · 2016 to 2018
$747k
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007033NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES023498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous epidemiologic studies have documented environmental health disparities according to race/ethnicity (R/E) to inform targeted interventions aimed at reducing these disparities. Yet, the use of R/E under the potential outcomes framework implies numerous underlying assumptions for epidemiologic studies that are often not carefully considered in environmental health research. In this commentary, we describe the current state of thinking about the interpretation of R/E variables in etiologic studies. We then discuss how such variables are commonly used in environmental epidemiology. We observed three main uses for R/E: i) as a confounder, ii) as an effect measure modifier and iii) as the main exposure of interest either through descriptive analysis or under a causal framework. We identified some common methodological concerns in each case and provided some practical solutions. The use of R/E in observational studies requires particular cautions in terms of formal interpretation and this commentary aims at providing a practical resource for future studies assessing racial/ethnic health disparities in environmental research.

Indexed as

Environmental HealthEpidemiologic StudiesEthnicityHealth Status DisparitiesRacial GroupsHumansResearchAir pollution and healthCausal inferenceRace/ethnicitySocial epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID33430882
PMCPMC7802337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.