Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33430823›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Toward patient-centered tuberculosis preventive treatment: preferences for regimens and formulations in Lima, Peru.

Courtney M Yuen, Ana K Millones, Jerome T Galea, Daniela Puma, Judith Jimenez, Leonid Lecca, Mercedes C Becerra, Salmaan Keshavjee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. TB preventive therapy preferences among children and adolescents.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Courtney M YuenDivision of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Courtney_Yuen@hms.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5219-2599
Ana K MillonesSocios En Salud Sucursal Perú, Lima, Peru.
Jerome T GaleaSchool of Social Work, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Daniela PumaSocios En Salud Sucursal Perú, Lima, Peru.
Judith JimenezSocios En Salud Sucursal Perú, Lima, Peru.
Leonid LeccaDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Mercedes C BecerraDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Salmaan KeshavjeeDivision of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
EsSALUD · PEBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

New approaches to optimizing the application and measuring the impact of community-based tuberculosis interventionsDP2MD015102 · NIMHD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI YUEN, COURTNEY M. · 2019 to 2019
$2.4M
NIMHD NIH HHS DP2 MD015102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo ensure patient-centered tuberculosis preventive treatment, it is important to consider factors that make it easier for patients to complete treatment. However, there is little published literature about patient preferences for different preventive treatment regimen options, particularly from countries with high tuberculosis burdens.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative research study using a framework analysis approach to understand tuberculosis preventive treatment preferences among household contacts. We conducted three focus group discussions with 16 members of families affected by tuberculosis in Lima, Peru. Participants were asked to vote for preferred preventive treatment regimens and discuss the reasons behind their choices. Coding followed a deductive approach based on prior research, with data-driven codes added.

resultsIn total, 7 (44%) participants voted for 3 months isoniazid and rifapentine, 4 (25%) chose 3 months isoniazid and rifampicin, 3 (19%) chose 4 months rifampicin, and 2 (13%) chose 6 months isoniazid. Preferences for shorter regimens over 6 months of isoniazid were driven by concerns over "getting tired" or "getting bored" of taking medications, the difficulty of remembering to take medications, side effects, and interference with daily life. For some, weekly dosing was perceived as being easier to remember and less disruptive, leading to a preference for 3 months isoniazid and rifapentine, which is dosed weekly. However, among caregivers, having a child-friendly formulation was more important than regimen duration. Caregivers reported difficulty in administering pills to children, and preferred treatments available as syrup or dispersible formulations.

conclusionsThere is demand for shorter regimens and child-friendly formulations for tuberculosis preventive treatment in high-burden settings. Individual preferences differ, suggesting that patient-centered care would best be supported by having multiple shorter regimens available.

Indexed as

IsoniazidTuberculosisAntitubercular AgentsChildClinical ProtocolsDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansPatient-Centered CarePeruAntitubercular AgentsIsoniazidChemoprophylaxisLatent tuberculosisPatient-centered carePatient preferenceTB preventive treatment

Identifiers

PMID33430823
PMCPMC7802335
OpenAlexW3120055440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.