Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33430810›Full record

Observational studyBMC cancer2021

Longitudinal analysis of cell-free mutated KRAS and CA 19-9 predicts survival following curative resection of pancreatic cancer.

Saskia Hussung, Dilara Akhoundova, Julian Hipp, Marie Follo, Rhena F U Klar, Ulrike Philipp, Florian Scherer, Nikolas von Bubnoff, Justus Duyster, Melanie Boerries and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Advances in Liquid Biopsy Technology and Implications for Pancreatic Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Saskia HussungDepartment of Medicine I (Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation), Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
Dilara AkhoundovaDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Zurich University Hospital, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
Julian HippDepartment of Surgery, Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
Marie FolloDepartment of Medicine I (Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation), Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
Rhena F U KlarDepartment of Medicine I (Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation), Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
Ulrike PhilippDepartment of Medicine I (Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation), Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
Florian SchererDepartment of Medicine I (Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation), Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
Nikolas von BubnoffDepartment of Medicine I (Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation), Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
Justus DuysterDepartment of Medicine I (Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation), Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
Melanie BoerriesGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Uwe WittelDepartment of Surgery, Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
Ralph M FritschDepartment of Medicine I (Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation), Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany. ralph.fritsch@usz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9639-3213
University Medical Center Freiburg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG CRC-850German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) FKZ 01ZX1708F
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNovel biomarkers and molecular monitoring tools hold potential to improve outcome for patients following resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We hypothesized that the combined longitudinal analysis of mutated cell-free plasma KRAS (cfKRAS

methodsBetween 07/2015 and 10/2018, we collected 134 plasma samples from 25 patients after R0/R1-resection of PDAC during adjuvant chemotherapy and post-treatment surveillance at our institution. Highly sensitive discriminatory multi-target ddPCR assays were employed to screen plasma samples for cfKRAS

resultsOut of 25 enrolled patients, 76% had undergone R0 resection and 48% of resected PDACs were pN0. 17/25 (68%) of patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 22.0 months, with 19 out of 25 (76%) patients relapsing during study period. Median RFS was 10.0 months, median OS was 22.0 months. Out of clinicopathologic variables, only postoperative CA 19-9 levels and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy correlated with survival endpoints. cfKRAS

conclusionsIntegrated analysis of cfKRAS

Indexed as

MutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCirculating Tumor DNAFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCirculating Tumor DNAKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Cell-free DNA (cfDNA)Circulating KRAS (cfKRAS mut)Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)Liquid biopsyMolecular monitoringPancreatic cancerPrognostic biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID33430810
PMCPMC7802224
OpenAlexW3120922379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.