Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33430784›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2021

Bruchid beetle ovipositioning mediated defense responses in black gram pods.

Debajit Das, Indrani K Baruah, Debashis Panda, Ricky Raj Paswan, Sumita Acharjee, Bidyut Kumar Sarmah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The SA-WRKY70-PR-Callose Axis Mediates Plant Defense Against Whitefly Eggs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Debajit DasDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India.
Indrani K BaruahOffice of the ICAR-National Professor (Norman Borlaug Chair) and DBT-AAU Centre, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, 785013, India.
Debashis PandaDistributed Information Centre, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India.
Ricky Raj PaswanDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India.
Sumita AcharjeeDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India. sumita.aus@gmail.com.
Bidyut Kumar SarmahDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India. bidyutsarmah@aau.ac.in.
Assam Agricultural University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlack gram [Vigna mungo (L)] seeds are a rich source of digestible protein and dietary fibre, both for human and animal consumption. However, the quality and quantity of the Vigna seeds are severely affected by bruchid beetles during storage. Therefore, analyses of the expression of the bruchid induced transcript dynamics in black gram pods would be helpful to understand the underlying defense mechanism against bruchid oviposition.

resultsWe used the RNAseq approach to survey the changes in transcript profile in the developing seeds of a moderately resistant cultivar IC-8219 against bruchid oviposition using a susceptible cultivar T-9 as a control. A total of 96,084,600 and 99,532,488 clean reads were generated from eight (4 each) samples of IC-8219 and T-9 cultivar, respectively. Based on the BLASTX search against the NR database, 32,584 CDSs were generated of which 31,817 CDSs were significantly similar to Vigna radiata, a close relative of Vigna mungo. The IC-8219 cultivar had 630 significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of which 304 and 326 genes up and down-regulated, respectively. However, in the T-9 cultivar, only 168 DEGs were identified of which 142 and 26 genes up and down-regulated, respectively. The expression analyses of 10 DEGs by qPCR confirmed the accuracy of the RNA-Seq data. Gene Ontology and KEGG pathway analyses helped us to better understand the role of these DEGs in oviposition mediated defense response of black gram. In both the cultivars, the most significant transcriptomic changes in response to the oviposition were related to the induction of defense response genes, transcription factors, secondary metabolites, enzyme inhibitors, and signal transduction pathways. It appears that the bruchid ovipositioning mediated defense response in black gram is induced by SA signaling pathways and defense genes such as defensin, genes for secondary metabolites, and enzyme inhibitors could be potential candidates for resistance to bruchids.

conclusionWe generated a transcript profile of immature black gram pods upon bruchid ovipositioning by de novo assembly and studied the underlying defense mechanism of a moderately resistant cultivar.

Indexed as

ColeopteraHost-Parasite InteractionsOvipositionAnimalsDisease ResistanceGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant DiseasesQuantitative Trait LociVignaBruchidCallosobruchus spde novo assemblyIllumina sequencingOvipositionTranscriptomeVigna mungo

Identifiers

PMID33430784
PMCPMC7802178
OpenAlexW3118683218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.