Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33430649›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2021

Structural Disadvantage and Culture, Race, and Ethnicity in Early Psychosis Services: International Provider Survey.

Nev Jones, Sarah Kamens, Oladunni Oluwoye, Franco Mascayano, Chris Perry, Marc Manseau, Michael T Compton

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Relationship Between Trauma Exposure and Nonclinical Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nev JonesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa (Jones); Department of Psychology, State University of New York Old Westbury, Old Westbury (Kamens); Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman (Oluwoye); Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City (Mascayano); Path Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (Perry); Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York City (Manseau); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York City (Compton).
Sarah KamensDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa (Jones); Department of Psychology, State University of New York Old Westbury, Old Westbury (Kamens); Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman (Oluwoye); Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City (Mascayano); Path Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (Perry); Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York City (Manseau); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York City (Compton).
Oladunni OluwoyeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa (Jones); Department of Psychology, State University of New York Old Westbury, Old Westbury (Kamens); Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman (Oluwoye); Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City (Mascayano); Path Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (Perry); Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York City (Manseau); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York City (Compton).
Franco MascayanoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa (Jones); Department of Psychology, State University of New York Old Westbury, Old Westbury (Kamens); Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman (Oluwoye); Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City (Mascayano); Path Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (Perry); Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York City (Manseau); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York City (Compton).
Chris PerryDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa (Jones); Department of Psychology, State University of New York Old Westbury, Old Westbury (Kamens); Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman (Oluwoye); Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City (Mascayano); Path Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (Perry); Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York City (Manseau); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York City (Compton).
Marc ManseauDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa (Jones); Department of Psychology, State University of New York Old Westbury, Old Westbury (Kamens); Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman (Oluwoye); Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City (Mascayano); Path Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (Perry); Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York City (Manseau); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York City (Compton).
Michael T ComptonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa (Jones); Department of Psychology, State University of New York Old Westbury, Old Westbury (Kamens); Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman (Oluwoye); Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City (Mascayano); Path Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (Perry); Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York City (Manseau); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York City (Compton).
SUNY Old Westbury · US

Funding

Improving Engagement among Families Experiencing First-Episode PsychosisK01MH117457 · NIMH · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI OLUWOYE, OLADUNNI · 2019 to 2022
$667k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH117457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLittle is known about provider perspectives on programmatic responses to structural disadvantage and cultural differences within early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services, programs, and models. The primary objective of this study was to investigate providers' perspectives on the impacts of disadvantage and minority race, ethnicity, and culture and to describe current practices and perceived gaps and concerns.

methodsAn online survey of specialized EIP providers was disseminated in the United Kingdom, United States, Canada, Australia, and Chile. A total of 164 providers, representing 110 unique sites, completed the survey. Closed-ended questions gathered demographic and program data, including information on formal assessment of trauma or adversity, integration of trauma-informed care, integration of formal cultural assessment tools, training focused on culture, programmatic changes to address culture-related issues, and consultation with cultural insiders. Open-ended questions addressed the demographic mix of the program's client population; the perceived role and influence of trauma, structural disadvantage, and cultural differences; and concerns and needs related to these topics. Frequencies were examined for closed-ended items; open-ended responses were systematically coded.

resultsOverall, survey findings suggested low levels of implementation of a variety of assessment and support practices related to cultural diversity in EIP programs. Coding of open-ended responses revealed numerous concerns regarding the impacts of disadvantage and cultural difference on clients and perceived gaps in policy and implementation.

conclusionsAn expansion of research and service development aimed at better meeting the disadvantage- and culture-related needs of young people with early psychosis and their families should be a priority for the field.

Indexed as

EthnicityPsychotic DisordersAdolescentAustraliaCanadaChileHumansUnited KingdomUnited StatesEarly intervention in psychosisEarly psychosisRace and ethnicityStructural disadvantage

Identifiers

PMID33430649
PMCPMC9119303
OpenAlexW3119383469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.