Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33430483›Full record

ArticleBiology2021

A Modelling Framework Linking Resource-Based Stochastic Translation to the Optimal Design of Synthetic Constructs.

Peter Sarvari, Duncan Ingram, Guy-Bart Stan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter SarvariQuantitative and Computational Biology, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Duncan IngramImperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1612-6842
Guy-Bart StanImperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5560-902X

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/M002187/1Royal Academy of Engineering CiET1819\5Wellcome Trust 203953/Z/16/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of gene expression burden on engineered cells has motivated the use of "whole-cell models" (WCMs) that use shared cellular resources to predict how unnatural gene expression affects cell growth. A common problem with many WCMs is their inability to capture translation in sufficient detail to consider the impact of ribosomal queue formation on mRNA transcripts. To address this, we have built a "stochastic cell calculator" (StoCellAtor) that combines a modified TASEP with a stochastic implementation of an existing WCM. We show how our framework can be used to link a synthetic construct's modular design (promoter, ribosome binding site (RBS) and codon composition) to protein yield during continuous culture, with a particular focus on the effects of low-efficiency codons and their impact on ribosomal queues. Through our analysis, we recover design principles previously established in our work on burden-sensing strategies, namely that changing promoter strength is often a more efficient way to increase protein yield than RBS strength. Importantly, however, we show how these design implications can change depending on both the duration of protein expression, and on the presence of ribosomal queues.

Indexed as

burdenconstruct designribosomal queuesslow codonstochastic simulationsynthetic biologyTASEPtranslationwhole-cell model

Identifiers

PMID33430483
PMCPMC7826857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.