Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33430290›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2021

Current Status and Future Perspectives of Liquid Biopsy in Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Patricia Mondelo-Macía, Jorge García-González, Luis León-Mateos, Adrián Castillo-García, Rafael López-López, Laura Muinelo-Romay, Roberto Díaz-Peña

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Advances in adoptive cell therapies in small cell lung cancer.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia Mondelo-MacíaLiquid Biopsy Analysis Unit, Oncomet, Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Jorge García-GonzálezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7672-9867
Luis León-MateosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0742-1209
Adrián Castillo-GarcíaFissac-Physiology, Health and Physical Activity, 28015 Madrid, Spain.
Rafael López-LópezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1315-655X
Laura Muinelo-RomayLiquid Biopsy Analysis Unit, Oncomet, Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7456-7531
Roberto Díaz-PeñaLiquid Biopsy Analysis Unit, Oncomet, Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 19% of all cancer-related deaths are due to lung cancer, which is the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) affects approximately 15% of patients diagnosed with lung cancer. SCLC is characterized by aggressiveness; the majority of SCLC patients present with metastatic disease, and less than 5% of patients are alive at 5 years. The gold standard of SCLC treatment is platinum and etoposide-based chemotherapy; however, its effects are short. In recent years, treatment for SCLC has changed; new drugs have been approved, and new biomarkers are needed for treatment selection. Liquid biopsy is a non-invasive, rapid, repeated and alternative tool to the traditional tumor biopsy that could allow the most personalized medicine into the management of SCLC patients. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are the most commonly used liquid biopsy biomarkers. Some studies have reported the prognostic factors of CTCs and cfDNA in SCLC patients, independent of the stage. In this review, we summarize the recent SCLC studies of CTCs, cfDNA and other liquid biopsy biomarkers, and we discuss the future utility of liquid biopsy in the clinical management of SCLC.

Indexed as

cfDNACTCliquid biopsylung cancerSCLC

Identifiers

PMID33430290
PMCPMC7825645
OpenAlexW3118975455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.