Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33430215›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

Rostrocaudal Distribution of the C-Fos-Immunopositive Spinal Network Defined by Muscle Activity during Locomotion.

Natalia Merkulyeva, Vsevolod Lyakhovetskii, Aleksandr Veshchitskii, Oleg Gorskii, Pavel Musienko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Forward Stepping Evoked by Transvertebral Stimulation in the Decerebrate Cat.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natalia MerkulyevaInstitute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint-Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya emb., 7-9, 199034 Saint-Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1276-1918
Vsevolod LyakhovetskiiPavlov Institute of Physiology RAS, Makarov emb., 6, 199034 Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Aleksandr VeshchitskiiPavlov Institute of Physiology RAS, Makarov emb., 6, 199034 Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Oleg GorskiiInstitute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint-Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya emb., 7-9, 199034 Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Pavel MusienkoInstitute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint-Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya emb., 7-9, 199034 Saint-Petersburg, Russia.

Funding

Neural mechanisms of locomotion evoked by epidural stimulation of the spinal cordR01NS100928 · NINDS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PRILUTSKY, BORIS I · 2017 to 2021
$2.7M
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health R01 NS-100928NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS100928Russian Foundation for Basic Research 19-015-00409Russian Foundation for Basic Research 20-015-00568St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia Project ID: 51134206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimization of multisystem neurorehabilitation protocols including electrical spinal cord stimulation and multi-directional tasks training require understanding of underlying circuits mechanisms and distribution of the neuronal network over the spinal cord. In this study we compared the locomotor activity during forward and backward stepping in eighteen adult decerebrated cats. Interneuronal spinal networks responsible for forward and backward stepping were visualized using the C-Fos technique. A bi-modal rostrocaudal distribution of C-Fos-immunopositive neurons over the lumbosacral spinal cord (peaks in the L4/L5 and L6/S1 segments) was revealed. These patterns were compared with motoneuronal pools using Vanderhorst and Holstege scheme; the location of the first peak was correspondent to the motoneurons of the hip flexors and knee extensors, an inter-peak drop was presumably attributed to the motoneurons controlling the adductor muscles. Both were better expressed in cats stepping forward and in parallel, electromyographic (EMG) activity of the hip flexor and knee extensors was higher, while EMG activity of the adductor was lower, during this locomotor mode. On the basis of the present data, which showed greater activity of the adductor muscles and the attributed interneuronal spinal network during backward stepping and according with data about greater demands on postural control systems during backward locomotion, we suppose that the locomotor networks for movements in opposite directions are at least partially different.

Indexed as

backward and forward steppingC-Fos techniquedecerebrated catlocomotor networksspinal cord

Identifiers

PMID33430215
PMCPMC7825657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.