Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33430123›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

The Resistance of Narrow-Leafed Lupin to

Michał Książkiewicz, Sandra Rychel-Bielska, Piotr Plewiński, Maria Nuc, Witold Irzykowski, Małgorzata Jędryczka, Paweł Krajewski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Comparative metabolomic profiling ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  4. Characterization of aToxins · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Transcriptional profiling of defense responses toFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michał KsiążkiewiczDepartment of Genomics, Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 60-479 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3382-8504
Sandra Rychel-BielskaDepartment of Genomics, Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 60-479 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2429-8054
Piotr PlewińskiDepartment of Genomics, Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 60-479 Poznań, Poland.
Maria NucDepartment of Biometry and Bioinformatics, Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 60-479 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6679-3571
Witold IrzykowskiDepartment of Pathogen Genetics and Plant Resistance, Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 60-479 Poznań, Poland.
Małgorzata JędryczkaDepartment of Pathogen Genetics and Plant Resistance, Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 60-479 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8583-0772
Paweł KrajewskiDepartment of Biometry and Bioinformatics, Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 60-479 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5318-9896
Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLWrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences · PL

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2015/17/D/NZ9/02112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Narrow-leafed lupin (

Indexed as

AscomycotaDisease ResistanceGene Expression ProfilingGenetic LinkageHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingLupinusPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesSelection, GeneticTranscriptomedefense responseexpressionlupinosisPhomopsis stem blightresistance genesequencingtranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID33430123
PMCPMC7827158
OpenAlexW3119119421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.