Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33429883›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2021

Detection of CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Mutations Using a Carbon Nanotube-Modified Electrochemical Genosensor.

Ezgi Kivrak, Tekle Pauzaite, Nikki A Copeland, John G Hardy, Pinar Kara, Melike Firlak, Atike I Yardimci, Selahattin Yilmaz, Fahreddin Palaz, Mehmet Ozsoz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ezgi KivrakDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ege University, Izmir 35100, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8552-3473
Tekle PauzaiteDepartment of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK.
Nikki A CopelandDepartment of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6204-4717
John G HardyDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0655-2167
Pinar KaraDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ege University, Izmir 35100, Turkey.
Melike FirlakDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1674-9086
Atike I YardimciDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Izmir Institute of Technology, İzmir 35430, Turkey.
Selahattin YilmazDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Izmir Institute of Technology, İzmir 35430, Turkey.
Fahreddin PalazFaculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06100, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9514-3172
Mehmet OzsozFaculty of Engineering, Near East University, Lefkoşa 99138, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4037-3445

Funding

North West Cancer Research CR1071North West Cancer Research CR879Royal Society NF151479Royal Society RG160449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR-Cas9 system has facilitated the genetic modification of various model organisms and cell lines. The outcomes of any CRISPR-Cas9 assay should be investigated to ensure/improve the precision of genome engineering. In this study, carbon nanotube-modified disposable pencil graphite electrodes (CNT/PGEs) were used to develop a label-free electrochemical nanogenosensor for the detection of point mutations generated in the genome by using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Carbodiimide chemistry was used to immobilize the 5'-aminohexyl-linked inosine-substituted probe on the surface of the sensor. After hybridization between the target sequence and probe at the sensor surface, guanine oxidation signals were monitored using differential pulse voltammetry (DPV). Optimization of the sensitivity of the nanogenoassay resulted in a lower detection limit of 213.7 nM. The nanogenosensor was highly specific for the detection of the precisely edited DNA sequence. This method allows for a rapid and easy investigation of the products of CRISPR-based gene editing and can be further developed to an array system for multiplex detection of different-gene editing outcomes.

Indexed as

Point Mutation3T3 CellsAnimalsBiosensing TechniquesCarbodiimidesCRISPR-Cas SystemsElectrodesGenetic EngineeringGraphiteLimit of DetectionMiceMutagenesis, Site-DirectedNanotubes, CarbonNuclear ProteinsCarbodiimidesCiz1 protein, mouseGraphiteNanotubes, CarbonNuclear Proteinscarbon nanotube-modified PGECRISPR-Cas9electrochemical genosensorhomology-directed repair (HDR)mutation detection

Identifiers

PMID33429883
PMCPMC7827051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.