ReviewClinical biochemistry2021
CRISPR-based tools: Alternative methods for the diagnosis of COVID-19.
Review in Clinical biochemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRISPR-Cas12a-based rapid detection of Babesia gibsoni and Ehrlichia canis in dogs using fluorometer platform.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- CRISPR Technology in Disease Management: An Updated Review of Clinical Translation and Therapeutic Potential.Cell proliferation · 2025Article
- Detection of Murine Norovirus on Fresh Produce Through a CRISPR/Cas13a RNase-Based Capsid Integrity Assay.Food and environmental virology · 2025Article
- Novel Strategies to Profile SARS-CoV-2 and Human Lung Proteome: Inflammatory Pathways in the Spotlight.BioMed research international · 2025Review
- Review
- Article
- A tree-based explainable AI model for early detection of Covid-19 using physiological data.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Ratiometric nonfluorescent CRISPR assay utilizing Cas12a-induced plasmid supercoil relaxation.Communications chemistry · 2024Article
- Special Issue "Molecular and Genetic Aspects of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Disease".International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay for the diagnosis of bovine Anaplasma marginale infection.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Advances and Challenges in SARS-CoV-2 Detection: A Review of Molecular and Serological Technologies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification-Integrated CRISPR Methods for Infectious Disease Diagnosis at Point of Care.ACS omega · 2023Review
- CRISPR-based diagnostics of different biomolecules from nucleic acids, proteins, and small molecules to exosomes.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2023Article
- Nano-based techniques: A revolutionary approach to prevent covid-19 and enhancing human awareness.Journal of drug delivery science and technology · 2023Review
- Potential of CRISPR/Cas system as emerging tools in the detection of viral hepatitis infection.Virology journal · 2023Review
- CRISPR-Based Diagnostics and Microfluidics for COVID-19 Point-of-Care Testing: A Review of Main Applications.Molecular biotechnology · 2023Review
- Conventional and Novel Diagnostic Tools for the Diagnosis of Emerging SARS-CoV-2 Variants.Vaccines · 2023Review
- Rapid, multiplex detection of SARS-CoV-2 using isothermal amplification coupled with CRISPR-Cas12a.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Portable high-throughput multimodal immunoassay platform for rapid on-site COVID-19 diagnostics.Analytica chimica acta · 2023Article
- COVID-19 diagnostics: Molecular biology to nanomaterials.Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recently emerged severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) spread all over the world rapidly and caused a global pandemic. To prevent the virus from spreading to more individuals, it is of great importance to identify and isolate infected individuals through testing. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is the gold standard method for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) worldwide. However, performing RT-qPCR is limited to centralized laboratories because of the need for sophisticated laboratory equipment and skilled personnel. Further, it can sometimes give false negative or uncertain results. Recently, new methods have been developed for nucleic acid detection and pathogen diagnosis using CRISPR-Cas systems. These methods present rapid and cost-effective diagnostic platforms that provide high sensitivity and specificity without the need for complex instrumentation. Using the CRISPR-based SARS-CoV-2 detection methods, it is possible to increase the number of daily tests in existing laboratories, reduce false negative or uncertain result rates obtained with RT-qPCR, and perform testing in resource-limited settings or at points of need where performing RT-qPCR is not feasible. Here, we briefly describe the RT-qPCR method, and discuss its limitations in meeting the current diagnostic needs. We explain how the unique properties of various CRISPR-associated enzymes are utilized for nucleic acid detection and pathogen diagnosis. Then, we highlight the important features of CRISPR-based diagnostic methods developed for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Finally, we examine the advantages and limitations of these methods, and discuss how they can contribute to improving the efficiency of the current testing systems for combating SARS-CoV-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.