Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33428870›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2021

Immunogenicity of the UK group B meningococcal vaccine (4CMenB) schedule against groups B and C meningococcal strains (Sched3): outcomes of a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Kimberly Davis, Marta Valente Pinto, Nick J Andrews, David Goldblatt, Ray Borrow, Helen Findlow, Jo Southern, Jo Partington, Emma Plested, Sima Patel and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02482636 (Assessment of Post Booster Antibody Responses in UK Infants Given a Reduced Priming Schedule of Meningococcal Serogroup B and 13 Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02482636 phase2completednot on this map

Assessment of Post Booster Antibody Responses in UK Infants Given a Reduced Priming Schedule of Meningococcal Serogroup B and 13 Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2015 to 2021Enrolled189ConditionsInfectious DiseasesArmsDTaP/IPV/Hib vaccine, 13 valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine, Rotavirus vaccine, 4-component Meningococcal B vaccine, Meningococcal C/Hib vaccine (MenC/Hib vaccine)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly DavisOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, UK.
Marta Valente PintoOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, UK.
Nick J AndrewsStatistics, Modelling and Economics Department, Public Health England, London, UK.
David GoldblattImmunobiology Section, University College London, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Ray BorrowVaccine Evaluation Unit, Public Health England, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
Helen FindlowVaccine Evaluation Unit, Public Health England, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
Jo SouthernImmunisation and Countermeasures Division, Public Health England, London, UK.
Jo PartingtonOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, UK.
Emma PlestedOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, UK.
Sima PatelVaccine Evaluation Unit, Public Health England, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
Ann HollandVaccine Evaluation Unit, Public Health England, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
Mary MathesonImmunoAssay Group, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Porton, Salisbury, UK.
Anna EnglandImmunoAssay Group, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Porton, Salisbury, UK.
Bassam HallisImmunoAssay Group, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Porton, Salisbury, UK.
Elizabeth MillerImmunisation and Countermeasures Division, Public Health England, London, UK.
Matthew D SnapeOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, UK; National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: matthew.snape@paediatrics.ox.ac.uk.
Public Health England · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBManchester Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of the multicomponent meningococcal vaccine 4CMenB in the UK schedule at 2, 4, and 12 months of age has been shown to be 59·1% effective at preventing invasive group B meningococcal disease. Here, we report the first data on the immunogenicity of this reduced-dose schedule to help to interpret this effectiveness estimate.

methodsIn this multicentre, parallel-group, open-label, randomised clinical trial, infants aged up to 13 weeks due to receive their primary immunisations were recruited via child health database mailouts in Oxfordshire and via general practice surgeries in Gloucestershire and Hertfordshire. Infants were randomly assigned (1:1) with permuted block randomisation to receive a 2 + 1 (2, 4, and 12 months; group 1) or 1 + 1 (3 and 12 months; group 2) schedule of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13). All infants also received 4CMenB at 2, 4, and 12 months of age, and had blood samples taken at 5 and 13 months. Participants and clinical trial staff were not masked to treatment allocation. Proportions of participants with human complement serum bactericidal antibody (hSBA) titres of at least 4 were determined for group B meningococcus (MenB) reference strains 5/99 (Neisserial Adhesin A [NadA]), NZ98/254 (porin A), and 44/76-SL (factor H binding protein [fHbp]). Geometric mean titres (GMTs) with 95% CIs were also calculated, and concomitant vaccine responses (group C meningococcus [MenC], Haemophilus influenzae b [Hib], tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis) were compared between groups. The primary outcome was PCV13 immunogenicity, with 4CMenB immunogenicity and reactogenicity as secondary outcomes. All individuals by randomised group with a laboratory result were included in the analysis. The study is registered on the EudraCT clinical trials database, 2015-000817-32, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02482636, and is complete.

findingsBetween Sept 22, 2015, and Nov 1, 2017, of 376 infants screened, 213 were enrolled (106 in group 1 and 107 in group 2). 204 samples post-primary immunisation and 180 post-boost were available for analysis. The proportion of participants with hSBA of at least 4 was similar in the two study groups. For strain 5/99, all participants developed hSBA titres above 4 in both groups and at both timepoints. For strain 44/76-SL, these proportions were 95·3% (95% CI 88·5-98·7) or above post-priming (82 of 86 participants in group 1), and 92·4% (84·2-97·2) or above post-boost (73 of 79 participants in group 1). For strain NZ98/254, these proportions were 86·5% (78·0-92·6) or above post-priming (83 of 96 participants in group 2) and 88·6% (79·5-94·7) or above post-boost (70 of 79 participants in group 1). The MenC rabbit complement serum bactericidal antibody (rSBA) titre in group 1 was significantly higher than in group 2 (888·3 vs 540·4; p=0·025). There was no significant difference in geometric mean concentrations between groups 1 and 2 for diphtheria, tetanus, Hib, and pertussis post-boost. A very small number of children did not have a protective response against 44/76-SL and NZ98/254. Local and systemic reactions were similar between the two groups, apart from the 3 month timepoint when one group received an extra dose of PCV13 and recorded more systemic reactions.

interpretationThese data support the recent change to the licensed European schedule for 4CMenB to add an infant 2 + 1 schedule, as used in the routine UK vaccine programme with an effectiveness of 59·1%. When compared with historical data, our data do not suggest that effectiveness would be higher with a 3 + 1 schedule, however a suboptimal boost response for bactericidal antibodies against vaccine antigen fHbp suggests a need for ongoing surveillance for vaccine breakthroughs due to fHbp-matched strains. Changing from a 2 + 1 to a 1 + 1 schedule for PCV13 for the UK is unlikely to affect protection against diphtheria, tetanus, and Hib, however an unexpected reduction in bactericidal antibodies against MenC seen with the new schedule suggests that ongoing surveillance for re-emergent MenC disease is important.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the National Institute for Health Research.

Indexed as

Immunization ScheduleAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineInfantMeningococcal InfectionsMeningococcal VaccinesNeisseria meningitidisNeisseria meningitidis, Serogroup CPneumococcal VaccinesRabbitsTetanus ToxoidUnited KingdomVaccinationVaccines, Conjugate13-valent pneumococcal vaccineAntibodies, BacterialMeningococcal VaccinesPneumococcal VaccinesTetanus ToxoidVaccines, Conjugate

Identifiers

PMID33428870
OpenAlexW3120136742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.