ArticleExperimental eye research2021
Topically instilled caffeine selectively alters emmetropizing responses in infant rhesus monkeys.
Article in Experimental eye research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute Effects of Oral Caffeine Intake on Human Global-Flash mfERG Responses: A Placebo-Controlled, Double-Masked, Balanced Crossover Study.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Trial
- Ocular Component Growth From the Cornea to the Sclera in Non-Human Primate Emmetropization.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Inhibition of Retinal AdoRA2a Activity Attenuates Myopia Progression.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- IMI-Interventions for Controlling Myopia Onset and Progression 2025.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Review
- Childhood Myopia Part II: Treatment Mechanisms, Emerging Options, and Considerations.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Review
- How Have Animal Models Increased our Understanding of Human Myopia?Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Review
- Caffeine and Vision: Effects on the Eye.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Retinal glia in myopia: current understanding and future directions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- IMI 2023 Digest.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- IMI-The Dynamic Choroid: New Insights, Challenges, and Potential Significance for Human Myopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Review
- Diurnal Variation and Effects of Dilation and Sedation on Intraocular Pressure in Infant Rhesus Monkeys.Current eye research · 2023Article
- Role of 7-methylxanthine in myopia prevention and control: a mini-review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Review
- Candidate pathways for retina to scleral signaling in refractive eye growth.Experimental eye research · 2022Review
- Comparing low-coherence interferometry and A-scan ultrasonography in measuring ocular axial dimensions in young rhesus monkeys.Experimental eye research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Oral administration of the adenosine receptor (ADOR) antagonist, 7-methylxanthine (7-MX), reduces both form-deprivation and lens-induced myopia in mammalian animal models. We investigated whether topically instilled caffeine, another non-selective ADOR antagonist, retards vision-induced axial elongation in monkeys. Beginning at 24 days of age, a 1.4% caffeine solution was instilled in both eyes of 14 rhesus monkeys twice each day until the age of 135 days. Concurrent with the caffeine regimen, the monkeys were fitted with helmets that held either -3 D (-3D/pl caffeine, n = 8) or +3 D spectacle lenses (+3D/pl caffeine, n = 6) in front of their lens-treated eyes and zero-powered lenses in front of their fellow-control eyes. Refractive errors and ocular dimensions were measured at baseline and periodically throughout the lens-rearing period. Control data were obtained from 8 vehicle-treated animals also reared with monocular -3 D spectacles (-3D/pl vehicle). In addition, historical comparison data were available for otherwise untreated lens-reared controls (-3D/pl controls, n = 20; +3D/pl controls, n = 9) and 41 normal monkeys. The vehicle controls and the untreated lens-reared controls consistently developed compensating axial anisometropias (-3D/pl vehicle = -1.44 ± 1.04 D; -3D/pl controls = -1.85 ± 1.20 D; +3D/pl controls = +1.92 ± 0.56 D). The caffeine regime did not interfere with hyperopic compensation in response to +3 D of anisometropia (+1.93 ± 0.82 D), however, it reduced the likelihood that animals would compensate for -3 D of anisometropia (+0.58 ± 1.82 D). The caffeine regimen also promoted hyperopic shifts in both the lens-treated and fellow-control eyes; 26 of the 28 caffeine-treated eyes became more hyperopic than the median normal monkey (mean (±SD) relative hyperopia = +2.27 ± 1.65 D; range = +0.31 to +6.37 D). The effects of topical caffeine on refractive development, which were qualitatively similar to those produced by oral administration of 7-MX, indicate that ADOR antagonists have potential in treatment strategies for preventing and/or reducing myopia progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.