Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33428641›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Performing point-of-care molecular testing for SARS-CoV-2 with RNA extraction and isothermal amplification.

Pierre Garneret, Etienne Coz, Elian Martin, Jean-Claude Manuguerra, Elodie Brient-Litzler, Vincent Enouf, Daniel Felipe González Obando, Jean-Christophe Olivo-Marin, Fabrice Monti, Sylvie van der Werf and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Comprehensive Review on Viral RNA Extraction Strategies for Enhanced Molecular Diagnostics.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Recent advances in point of care testing for COVID-19 detection.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pierre GarneretESPCI PSL, CBI, IPGG, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1097-4488
Etienne CozESPCI PSL, CBI, IPGG, Paris, France.
Elian MartinESPCI PSL, CBI, IPGG, Paris, France.
Jean-Claude ManuguerraInstitut Pasteur, Paris Cedex, France.
Elodie Brient-LitzlerInstitut Pasteur, Paris Cedex, France.
Vincent EnoufInstitut Pasteur, Paris Cedex, France.
Daniel Felipe González ObandoInstitut Pasteur, Paris Cedex, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5964-3057
Jean-Christophe Olivo-MarinInstitut Pasteur, Paris Cedex, France.
Fabrice MontiESPCI PSL, CBI, IPGG, Paris, France.
Sylvie van der WerfInstitut Pasteur, Paris Cedex, France.
Jessica VanhomwegenInstitut Pasteur, Paris Cedex, France.
Patrick TabelingESPCI PSL, CBI, IPGG, Paris, France.
Institut Pasteur · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To respond to the urgent need for COVID-19 testing, countries perform nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in centralized laboratories. Real-time RT-PCR (Reverse transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction), used to amplify and detect the viral RNA., is considered, as the current gold standard for diagnostics. It is an efficient process, but the complex engineering required for automated RNA extraction and temperature cycling makes it incompatible for use in point of care settings [1]. In the present work, by harnessing progress made in the past two decades in isothermal amplification and paper microfluidics, we created a portable test, in which SARS-CoV-2 RNA is extracted, amplified isothermally by RT-LAMP (Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification), and detected using intercalating dyes or fluorescent probes. Depending on the viral load in the tested samples, the detection takes between twenty minutes and one hour. Using a set of 16 pools of naso-pharyngal swab eluates, we estimated a limit of detection comparable to real-time RT-PCR (i.e. 1 genome copies per microliter of clinical sample) and no cross-reaction with eight major respiratory viruses currently circulating in Europe. We designed and fabricated an easy-to-use portable device called "COVIDISC" to carry out the test at the point of care. The low cost of the materials along with the absence of complex equipment will expedite the widespread dissemination of this device. What is proposed here is a new efficient tool to help managing the pandemics.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care TestingCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingEquipment DesignHumansLimit of DetectionMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Time FactorsRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID33428641
PMCPMC7799764
OpenAlexW3048028928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.