Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33428583›Full record

Trial reportJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2020

Durvalumab and tremelimumab with or without stereotactic body radiation therapy in relapsed small cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II study.

Suchita Pakkala, Kristin Higgins, Zhengjia Chen, Gabriel Sica, Conor Steuer, Chao Zhang, Guojing Zhang, Shuhua Wang, Mohammad S Hossain, Bassel Nazha and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. CD4Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. The Five-Decade Journey of Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Reprogramming cancer immunity with next-generation combination therapies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suchita PakkalaHematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Kristin HigginsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Zhengjia ChenHematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Gabriel SicaPathology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Conor SteuerHematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Chao ZhangBiostatistics, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Guojing ZhangHematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Shuhua WangHematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Mohammad S HossainHematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Bassel NazhaHematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Tyler BeardsleeHematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Fadlo R KhuriHematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Walter CurranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sagar LonialHematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Edmund K WallerHematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Suresh RamalingamHematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Taofeek K OwonikokoHematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA towonik@emory.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7724-7728
Emory University · US

Funding

Winship Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA138292 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Suresh S Ramalingam · 2009 to 2026
$47.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint blockade (ICB) targeting programmed cell death protein 1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 has achieved modest clinical activity as salvage therapy in relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We conducted this signal-finding study to assess the efficacy of ICB with or without radiation in relapsed SCLC.

methodsPatients with relapsed SCLC and ≤2 previous lines of therapy were randomized to (1) arm A: durvalumab (D) 1500 mg/tremelimumab (T) 75 mg (intravenously every 4 weeks without stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)) or (2) arm B: immune-sensitizing SBRT to one selected tumor site (9 Gy × 3 fractions) followed by D/T. Treatment continued until progression or a maximum of 12 months. The co-primary endpoints of the study were overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). We evaluated circulating lymphocyte repertoire in serial peripheral blood samples and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) from on-treatment biopsies as pharmacodynamic markers.

resultsEighteen patients were randomized to arms A and B (n=9 each): median age 70 years; 41.2% women. The median PFS and ORR were 2.1 months and 0% in arm A and 3.3 months and 28.6% in arm B. The median overall survival (OS) was 2.8 months in arm A and 5.7 months in arm B (p=0.3772). Pooled efficacy of D/T±SBRT in 15 Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) evaluable patients across both arms showed the best ORR in terms of partial response in 13.3%, stable disease in 26.6% and progressive disease in 60.0%; the overall median PFS and OS were 2.76 and 3.9 months. The most common adverse events were grade 1 fatigue (66%) and grade 1 elevated amylase (56%) in arm A, and grade 1 fatigue (56%) and pain (44%) in arm B. There was a significant increase in activated CD8(+)ICOS+ T cells (p=0.048) and a reduction in naïve T cells (p=0.0454) in peripheral blood following treatment, along with a significant amount of activated CD8+ICOS+ T cells in TILs from responders.

conclusionsThe D/T combination with and without SBRT was safe but did not show sufficient efficacy signal in relapsed SCLC. Changes in peripheral blood lymphocyte and TILs were consistent with an immunologic response.

Indexed as

AgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiosurgerySmall Cell Lung CarcinomaAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizeddurvalumabtremelimumabclinical trialsimmunotherapylung neoplasmsphase II as topicprogrammed cell death 1 receptorradioimmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33428583
PMCPMC7754662
OpenAlexW3117633542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.