ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2021
Linear Signal Cancellation of Nonlinear Pulsing Schemes in a Verasonics Research Scanner.
Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Principle of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2024Review
- Dual-Mode 1-D Linear Ultrasound Array for Image-Guided Drug Delivery Enhancement Without Ultrasound Contrast Agents.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2023Article
- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound with Optimized Aperture Patterns and Bubble Segmentation Based on Echo Phase.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a real-time imaging technique that allows the visualization of organ and tumor microcirculation by utilizing the nonlinear response of microbubbles. Nonlinear pulsing schemes are used exclusively in CEUS imaging modes in modern scanners. One important aspect of nonlinear pulsing schemes is the near-complete elimination of the linear signals that originate from tissue. Up until now, no study has investigated the performance of Verasonics scanners in eliminating the linear signals during CEUS and, by extension, the optimal pulsing sequences for performing CEUS. The aim of this article was to investigate linear signal cancellation of the Verasonics scanner performing nonlinear pulsing schemes with two different probes (L7-4 linear array and C5-2 convex array). We have considered two pulsing schemes: pulse inversion (PI) and amplitude modulation (AM). We have also compared our results from the Verasonics scanner with a clinical scanner (Philips iU22). We found that the linear signal cancellation of the transmitted pulse by Verasonics scanner was ~40 dB in AM mode and ~30 dB in PI mode when operated at 0.06 MI. The linear signal cancellation performance of Verasonics scanner was comparable with Philips iU22 scanner in focused AM mode and on average 3 dB better than Philips iU22 scanner in focused PI mode.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.