Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33428177›Full record

Trial reportCNS drugs2021

Safety and Efficacy of Sovateltide (IRL-1620) in a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial in Patients with Acute Cerebral Ischemic Stroke.

Anil Gulati, Nilesh Agrawal, Deepti Vibha, U K Misra, Birinder Paul, Dinesh Jain, Jeyaraj Pandian, Rupam Borgohain

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in CNS drugs, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04046484 phase2completednot on this map

A Prospective, Multicentric, Randomized, Double Blind, Parallel, Saline Controlled Phase II Clinical Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of PMZ-1620 Therapy Along With Standard Supportive Care in Subjects of Acute Ischemic Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorPharmazz, Inc.Ran2018 to 2019Enrolled40ConditionsAcute Stroke, Cerebral IschemiaArmsNormal Saline along with standard treatment, PMZ-1620 along with standard treatment
NCT04047563 phase3completednot on this map

A Prospective, Multicentric, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel, Phase III Clinical Study to Assess Efficacy of PMZ-1620 Along With Standard Treatment in Patients of Acute Ischemic Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorPharmazz, Inc.Ran2019 to 2022Enrolled158ConditionsCerebral Ischemia, Cerebral Infarction, Stroke, AcuteArmsNormal Saline along with standard treatment, PMZ-1620 (sovateltide) along with standard treatment
NCT05514340 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase-II Trial to Assess Safety, and Efficacy of Sovateltide in the Treatment of Hypoxic-ischemic Encephalopathy in Neonates

TypeinterventionalSponsorPharmazz, Inc.Ran2023 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsHypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy, Neonatal Asphyxia, Neonatal EncephalopathyArmsNormal Saline along with standard treatment, Sovateltide along with standard treatment
NCT05691244 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Multicentric, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel, Placebo-controlled Phase III Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Sovateltide in Patients With Acute Cerebral Ischemic Stroke.

TypeinterventionalSponsorPharmazz, Inc.Ran2025 to 2026Enrolled514ConditionsAcute Ischemic Stroke, Cerebral StrokeArmsDrug: Normal Saline, Sovateltide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Annexin A1: The dawn of ischemic stroke (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Bridging the gap: a translational perspective in spinal cord injury.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Neuroprotective Strategies for Ischemic Stroke-Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anil GulatiPharmazz, Inc., 50 West 75th Street, Suite 105, Willowbrook, IL, 60527, USA. agulat@midwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7420-4554
Nilesh AgrawalNew Era Hospital, Nagpur, India.
Deepti VibhaAll India Inst of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
U K MisraSanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
Birinder PaulDayanand Medical College, Ludhiana, India.
Dinesh JainDayanand Medical College, Ludhiana, India.
Jeyaraj PandianChristian Medical College, Ludhiana, India.
Rupam BorgohainNizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSovateltide (IRL-1620, PMZ-1620), an endothelin-B receptor agonist, has been previously shown to increase cerebral blood flow, have anti-apoptotic activity and produce neurovascular remodeling when administered intravenously following acute cerebral ischemic stroke in rats. Its safety and tolerability were confirmed in healthy human volunteers (CTRI/2016/11/007509).

objectiveOur objective was to determine the safety, tolerability and efficacy of sovateltide as an addition to standard of care (SOC) in patients with acute cerebral ischemic stroke.

methodsA prospective, multicentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to compare the safety (primary objective) and efficacy (secondary objective) of sovateltide in patients with acute cerebral ischemic stroke. Adult males or females aged 18-70 years who had experienced a radiologically confirmed ischemic stroke within the last 24 h were included in the study. Patients with intracranial hemorrhage and those receiving endovascular therapy were excluded. Patients randomized to the sovateltide group received three doses of sovateltide (each dose 0.3 µg/kg) administered as an intravenous bolus over 1 min at an interval of 3 ± 1 h on day 1, day 3 and day 6 (total dose of 0.9 µg/kg/day). Patients randomized to the placebo group received an equal volume of saline. Every patient in both groups received SOC for stroke. Efficacy was evaluated using neurological outcomes based on National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Barthel Index (BI) scores from day 1 through day 90. Quality of life was measured using the EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SSQoL) at 60 and 90 days of follow-up.

resultsA total of 40 patients with acute cerebral ischemic stroke were enrolled in this study, of whom 36 completed the 90-day follow-up. Patients received saline (n = 18; 11 male and 7 female) or sovateltide (n = 18; 15 male and 3 female) within 24 h of onset of stroke. The number of patients receiving investigational drug within 20 h of onset of stroke was 14/18 in the saline group and 10/18 in the sovateltide group. The baseline characteristics and SOC in both cohorts was similar. Sovateltide was well-tolerated, and all patients received complete treatment with no incidence of drug-related adverse events. Hemodynamic, biochemical or hematological parameters were not affected by sovateltide. Sovateltide treatment resulted in improved mRS and BI scores on day 6 compared with day 1 (p < 0.0001), an effect not seen in the saline group. Sovateltide increased the frequency of favorable outcomes at 3 months. An improvement of ≥ 2 points on the mRS was observed in 60 and 40% of patients in the sovateltide and saline groups, respectively (p = 0.0519; odds ratio [OR] 5.25). An improvement on the BI of ≥ 40 points was seen in 64 and 36% of the sovateltide and saline groups, respectively (p = 0.0112; OR 12.44). An improvement of ≥6 points on the NIHSS was seen in 56% of patients in the sovateltide group versus 43% in the saline group (p = 0.2714; OR 2.275). The number of patients with complete recovery (defined as an NIHSS score of 0 and a BI of 100) was significantly greater (p < 0.05) in the sovateltide group than in the saline group. An assessment of complete recovery using an mRS score of 0 did not show a statistically significant difference between the treatment groups. Sovateltide treatment resulted in improved quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D and SSQoL on day 90.

conclusionSovateltide was safe and well-tolerated and resulted in improved neurological outcomes in patients with acute cerebral ischemic stroke 90 days post-treatment.

trial registrationThe study is registered at CTRI/2017/11/010654 and NCT04046484.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaDouble-Blind MethodEndothelinsFemaleHumansInjections, IntravenousIschemic StrokeMaleMiddle AgedPeptide FragmentsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeReceptor, Endothelin BTreatment OutcomeEndothelinsPeptide FragmentsReceptor, Endothelin Bsovateltide

Identifiers

PMID33428177
PMCPMC7872992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.