ArticleEmergency radiology2021
Clinical and laboratory parameters in blunt pelvic trauma not associated with subsequent positive conventional angiography in patients with positive CTA.
Article in Emergency radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: sixth edition.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Guideline
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluates clinical and laboratory parameters, as well as extravasation and hematoma size on CTA as potential predictors of conventional angiogram (CA) results.
methodsThis is a retrospective study of 380 adult patients presenting with pelvic trauma over a 9-year period. Of these patients, 91 were found to have active arterial extravasation on initial CTA. Statistical analysis between the two groups +CA versus -CA was performed to determine whether clinical and laboratory parameters, as well as extravasation size and hematoma size could predict CA results.
resultsThere were no significant differences in all clinical and laboratory data, including hemodynamic instability (defined as systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg) on presentation (22.2% vs. 21.4%), except for Glasgow Coma Scale (p = 0.015) when comparing the two groups. Extravasation size and hematoma size as continuous or categorical variables were not predictive of subsequent positive CA. Secondary analysis demonstrated no association between select parameters (i.e., hematocrit, systolic blood pressure, and lactate) and subsequent positive CA while controlling for extravasation size or hematoma size.
conclusionClinical and laboratory parameters in blunt pelvic trauma with arterial hemorrhage were not significantly associated with subsequent conventional angiography results, once accounting for degree of hemorrhage. The area of the foci of active extravasation and hematoma size in the axial plane were not significantly associated with the need for embolization. We conclude from these findings that catheter angiography should be considered in patients with blunt pelvic trauma found to have active arterial extravasation, regardless of size of bleed or the patient's clinical or laboratory values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.