ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2021
Factors influencing precautions against antineoplastic drug exposure among nurses and nurse assistants in Thailand.
Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative analysis of dermal and inhalation exposures to antineoplastic drugs among workers in the workplaces: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Global Cancer Nurse's Experiences and Perceptions of Potential Occupational Exposure to Cytotoxic Drugs: Mixed Method Systematic Review With Framework Synthesis.Journal of clinical nursing · 2024Pooled it
- Assessed the effectiveness of an educational program for nurses administering antineoplastic drugs; comparative intervention research before and after.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Factors Influencing the Use of Personal Protective Equipment in the Handling of Chemotherapy Drugs Among Nursing Staff in Cancer Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Nurses' and midwives' knowledge and safe-handling practices related to hazardous drugs: A cross-sectional study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAntineoplastic drugs (AD) are important chemical risks for healthcare workers. Precautions against AD exposure include the use of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). Evaluation of PPE usage during patient care processes has not been reported in Thailand. We aimed to evaluate the level of PPE usage and factors predicting PPE usage among nurses and nurse assistants in Thailand.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in a university hospital and two general hospitals. The questionnaires covered demographic characteristics, self-reported use of PPE and 7 predictive factors. Mixed-effects modeling was used to determine the association between standardized score of predictive factors and PPE usage score.
resultsThe response rate was 78.6% and 884 participants were left for analysis after data cleaning. Among nurses (n = 499), higher PPE usage score was associated with self-efficacy (β = 0.28, 95% CI 0.21, 0.34), workplace safety climate (β = 0.27, 95% CI 0.20, 0.34), and conflict of interest (β = - 0.07, 95% CI - 0.14, - 0.01). Among nurse assistants (n = 385), higher PPE usage score was associated with self-efficacy (β = 0.27, 95% CI 0.18, 0.36), interpersonal influence (β = 0.14, 95% CI 0.04, 0.24), workplace safety climate (β = 10.29, 95% CI 0.19, 0.38), and conflict of interest (β = - 0.14, 95% CI - 0.24, - 0.03).
conclusionsSeveral factors were associated with PPE usage among nurses and nurse assistants. Improved PPE usage against AD can be promoted through interventions that modify those factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33427994What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.