Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33427930›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2021

Current status on the biodegradability of acrylic polymers: microorganisms, enzymes and metabolic pathways involved.

Itzel Gaytán, Manuel Burelo, Herminia Loza-Tavera

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Biodegradation of Acrylic-Coated Woven Fabrics byMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Itzel GaytánDepartamento de Bioquímica, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ave. Universidad 3000. Col. UNAM., 04510, Mexico City, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8724-3675
Manuel BureloLaboratorio de Química Sostenible, Departamento de Química Analítica, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ave. Universidad 3000. Col. UNAM., 04510, Mexico City, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4628-6254
Herminia Loza-TaveraDepartamento de Bioquímica, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ave. Universidad 3000. Col. UNAM., 04510, Mexico City, México. hlozat@unam.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7473-7537
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología 101737PAIP-Facultad de Química-UNAM 5000-9117UNAM-DGAPA-PAPIIT IN227620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acrylic polymers (AP) are a diverse group of materials with broad applications, frequent use, and increasing demand. Some of the most used AP are polyacrylamide, polyacrylic acid, polymethyl methacrylates, and polyacrylonitrile. Although no information for the production of all AP types is published, data for the most used AP is around 9 MT/year, which gives an idea of the amount of waste that can be generated after products' lifecycles. After its lifecycle ends, the fate of an AP product will depend on its chemical structure, the environmental setting where it was used, and the regulations for plastic waste management existing in the different countries. Even though recycling is the best fate for plastic polymer wastes, few AP can be recycled, and most of them end up in landfills. Because of the pollution crisis the planet is immersed, setting regulations and developing technological strategies for plastic waste management are urgent. In this regard, biotechnological approaches, where microbial activity is involved, could be attractive eco-friendly strategies. This mini-review describes the broad AP diversity, their properties and uses, and the factors affecting their biodegradability, underlining the importance of standardizing biodegradation quantification techniques. We also describe the enzymes and metabolic pathways that microorganisms display to attack AP chemical structure and predict some biochemical reactions that could account for quaternary carbon-containing AP biodegradation. Finally, we analyze strategies to increase AP biodegradability and stress the need for more studies on AP biodegradation and developing stricter legislation for AP use and waste control. KEY POINTS: • Acrylic polymers (AP) are a diverse and extensively used group of compounds. • The environmental fates and health effects of AP waste are not completely known. • Microorganisms and enzymes involved in AP degradation have been identified. • More biodegradation studies are needed to develop AP biotechnological treatments.

Indexed as

PlasticsWaste ManagementBiodegradation, EnvironmentalMetabolic Networks and PathwaysPolymersPlasticsPolymersAcrylic polymersBiodegradation ratesBiodegradative pathwaysC-C backbone recalcitranceEnvironmental fates

Identifiers

PMID33427930
PMCPMC7798386
OpenAlexW3118722851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.