ArticleInternational orthopaedics2021
Clinical study on minimally invasive treatment of femoral head necrosis with two different bone graft materials.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evaluating the clinical potential of bioceramic-rods for revascularization in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review.International orthopaedics · 2025Pooled it
- One in five patients require conversion to arthroplasty after non-vascularized bone grafts in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of the outcome of different bone grafts combined with modified core decompression for the treatment of ARCO II stage femoral head necrosis.International orthopaedics · 2022Trial
- Comparative Efficacy of Bone Defect Filler Strategies Following Lesion Debridement for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Review
- Arthroscopy-Assisted Core Decompression Combined with Octacalcium Phosphate/Gelatin Composite Implantation for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Study Protocol for a Single-Center Externally Controlled Trial.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advancements in 3D printing technologies for personalized treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Hip joint-preserving strategies for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head: From nonoperative to operative procedures.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Review
- Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Combined Therapies Based on Modified Core Decompression for the Treatment of Early-stage Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Retrospective Clinical Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
- Combination of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and ibuprofen to reduce pain in femoral head necrosis.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Hydrogel microspheres for bone regeneration through regulation of the regenerative microenvironment.Biomaterials translational · 2024Review
- An all-arthroscopic light bulb technique to treat osteonecrosis of the femoral head through outside-in fashion without distraction: A case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Treatment of pre-collapse non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head through Orthopdische Chirurgie München approach combined with autologous bone mixed with β-tricalcium phosphate porous bioceramic bone graft: a retrospective study of mid-term results.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of two different bone graft materials in the minimally invasive treatment of early and middle stage femoral head necrosis.
methodsA total of 36 patients (39 hips) with avascular necrosis of the femoral head were divided into autologous iliac bone group (ABG) and bioceramics bone group (BBG). Both groups were treated with minimally invasive thick channel decompression to remove dead bone of femoral head. The ABG was treated with autologous iliac bone graft, and BBG was treated with β-tricalcium phosphate bone graft. The operation time, intra-operative blood loss, haemoglobin, and haematocrit were recorded at three and seven days post-operatively. The clinical efficacy and safety were evaluated by Harris score and imaging examination before, and after treatment and at follow-up stages.
resultsThe patients were followed up for 24 to 45 (average 29.27 ± 3.56) months. The BBG was significantly better than the ABG in terms of operation time, intra-operative blood loss, haemoglobin, and haematocrit value at three days. Compared with pre-operative, the Harris score of the two groups at 12 months after operation was significantly improved. The Harris score and the imaging evaluation of the last follow-up exhibited significantly better outcome in BBG than those of ABG.
conclusionBioceramics and autologous iliac bone minimally invasive treatment of early and medium-term femoral head necrosis exhibited satisfactory clinical efficacy in the short and medium-term. The bioceramics graft materials have the advantages of reducing trauma, bleeding, operation time, and quick recovery of post-operative functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33427895What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.