Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33427894›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2021

[Management of errors and complications in surgery].

Philipp Houben, Andreas Pascher

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philipp HoubenKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, 48149, Münster, Deutschland.
Andreas PascherKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, 48149, Münster, Deutschland. Andreas.Pascher@ukmuenster.de.
University Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of errors and complications makes a significant contribution to the quality assurance of a surgical department. The structured risk management is an integral component of the surgeon's duties that is reflected by the growing relevance of simulation and other training methods employed during medical specialist advanced training. Basic prerequisites for establishing an error culture that aims at improvement of patient safety and the constructive coping with complications, are the removal of taboos and the transparent processing of complicating courses of treatment. Detecting structural and systemic sources of error is preferrable to the application of approaches that focus on individual responsibility, e.g. shame and blame. There are numerous validated tools available for the prevention, recognition and successful treatment of complications. Team time out protocols for circumventing fatal errors, standardized operating procedures and morbidity and mortality conferences are the most important measures for ensuring patient safety. The standardized, consistent and interdisciplinary handling of unavoidable complications according to the failure to rescue concept is pivotal for the prevention of a fatal course.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyRisk ManagementHumansMedical ErrorsError cultureFailure to rescuePatient safetyQuality assuranceStandardization

Identifiers

PMID33427894
PMCPMC7799162
OpenAlexW3120357728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.