Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33427884›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2021

Outcomes After Elective Inguinal Hernia Repair Performed by Associate Clinicians vs Medical Doctors in Sierra Leone: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Thomas Ashley, Hannah Ashley, Andreas Wladis, Håkon A Bolkan, Alex J van Duinen, Jessica H Beard, Hertta Kalsi, Juuli Palmu, Pär Nordin, Kristina Holm and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Adult groin hernia surgery in sub-Saharan Africa: a 20-year systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Long-Term Outcomes Following Inguinal Hernia Repair With Mesh Performed by Medical Doctors and Surgeons in Ghana.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Thomas AshleyKamakwie Wesleyan Hospital, Kamakwie, Sierra Leone.
Hannah AshleyThe Lakes Medical Practice, Penrith, United Kingdom.
Andreas WladisDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Håkon A BolkanDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Alex J van DuinenDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Jessica H BeardLewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Hertta KalsiSkåne University Hospital, Skåne, Sweden.
Juuli PalmuKiruna Hospital, Kiruna, Sweden.
Pär NordinDepartment of Surgery and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Kristina HolmMälarsjukhuset, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
Michael Ohene-YeboahDepartment of Surgery, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Jenny LöfgrenDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SELinköping University · SENorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOSkåne University Hospital · SESt Olav's University Hospital · NOTemple University · USUmeå University · SEUniversity of Cumbria · GBUniversity of Ghana · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Task sharing of surgical duties with medical doctors (MDs) without formal surgical training and associate clinicians (ACs; health care workers corresponding to an educational level between that of a nurse and an MD) is practiced to provide surgical services to people in low-resource settings. The safety and effectiveness of this has not been fully evaluated through a randomized clinical trial. Objective: To determine whether task sharing with MDs and ACs is safe and effective in mesh hernia repair in Sierra Leone. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-blind, noninferiority randomized clinical trial included adult, healthy men with primary inguinal hernia randomized to receiving surgical treatment from an MD or an AC. In Sierra Leone, ACs practicing surgery have received 2 years of surgical training and completed a 1-year internship. The study was conducted between October 2017 and February 2019. Patients were followed up at 2 weeks and 1 year after operations. Observers were blinded to the study arm of the patients. The study was carried out in a first-level hospital in rural Sierra Leone. Data were analyzed from March to June 2019. Interventions: All patients received an open mesh inguinal hernia repair under local anesthesia. The control group underwent operations performed by MDs, and the intervention group underwent operations performed by ACs. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was hernia recurrence at 1 year. Outcomes were assessed by blinded observers at 2 weeks and 1 year after operations. Results: A total of 230 patients were recruited (mean [SD] age, 43.0 [13.5] years), and all but 1 patient underwent inguinal hernia repair between October 23, 2017, and February 2, 2018, performed by 5 MDs and 6 ACs. A total of 114 patients were operated on by MDs, and 115 patients were operated on by ACs. There were no crossovers between the study arms. The follow-up rate was 100% at 2 weeks and 94.1% at 1 year. At 1 year, hernia recurrence occurred in 7 patients (6.9%) operated on by MDs and 1 patient (0.9%) operated on by ACs (absolute difference, -6.0 [95% CI, -11.2 to 0.7] percentage points; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings demonstrate that task sharing of elective mesh inguinal hernia repair with ACs was safe and effective. The task sharing debate should progress to focus on optimizing surgical training programs for nonsurgeons and building capacity for elective surgical care in low- and middle-income countries. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN63478884.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEducational StatusAdultElective Surgical ProceduresHernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyHumansMaleRecurrenceSierra LeoneSingle-Blind Method

Identifiers

PMID33427884
PMCPMC7801936
OpenAlexW3121060715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.