ArticleJournal of global health2020
Impact of the
Article in Journal of global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02726230 (Bihar Family Health Initiative), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Bihar Family Health Initiative (Ananya)
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methodology for measuring behavior change dictates the perceived effectiveness of school-based WASH interventions.Frontiers in public health · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Reframing preventive health communication: from individual compliance to collective action.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- "I Am Going to Take It Up": Implementing Skin-to-Skin Contact in Uganda.Maternal & child nutrition · 2025Article
- Kerala's public healthcare services: Bihar's blueprint for post-COVID-19 resilience.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Strengthening theories of change in women's group interventions to improve learning.Journal of global health · 2023Article
- Article
- Improving the precision of maternal, newborn, and child health impact through geospatial analysis of the association of contextual and programmatic factors with health trends in Bihar, India.Journal of global health · 2022Article
- Evaluation of a large-scale reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health and nutrition program in Bihar, India, through an equity lens.Journal of global health · 2020Article
- Trends in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health and nutrition indicators during five years of piloting and scaling-up ofJournal of global health · 2020Review
- Health impact of self-help groups scaled-up statewide in Bihar, India.Journal of global health · 2020Article
- Geospatial variations in trends of reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health and nutrition indicators at block level in Bihar, India, during scale-up ofJournal of global health · 2020Article
- Improving primary health care delivery in Bihar, India: Learning from piloting and statewide scale-up ofJournal of global health · 2020Article
- Impact of mHealth interventions for reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health and nutrition at scale: BBC Media Action and theJournal of global health · 2020Article
- Learning fromJournal of global health · 2020Review
- Statewide implementation of a quality improvement initiative for reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health and nutritionin Bihar, India.Journal of global health · 2020Review
- Health layering of self-help groups: impacts on reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health and nutrition in Bihar, India.Journal of global health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Government of Bihar (GoB) in India, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and several non-governmental organisations launched the
methodsThe quasi-experimental impact evaluation included statewide household surveys at two time points during the pilot phase: January-April 2012 ("baseline") including an initial cohort of beneficiaries and January-April 2014 ("midline") with a new cohort. The two arms were: 1) eight intervention districts, and 2) a comparison arm comprised of the remaining 30 districts in Bihar where
resultsIndicators in the two arms were similar at baseline. Overall, 40% of indicators (20 of 51) changed significantly from baseline to midline in the comparison districts unrelated to
conclusionsThe STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02726230.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.