Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33427211›Full record

ArticleJCI insight2021

Targeting G1/S phase cell-cycle genomic alterations and accompanying co-alterations with individualized CDK4/6 inhibitor-based regimens.

Shumei Kato, Ryosuke Okamura, Jacob J Adashek, Noor Khalid, Suzanna Lee, Van Nguyen, Jason K Sicklick, Razelle Kurzrock

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCI insight, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02478931 (UCSD Profile Related Evidence Determining Individualized Cancer Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02478931 recruitingnot on this map

UCSD Profile Related Evidence Determining Individualized Cancer Therapy (UCSD PREDICT)

TypeobservationalSponsorShu Mei KatoRan2013 to 2027Enrolled10,000ConditionsCancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Overexpression ofTranslational lung cancer research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. IKZF1Pediatric blood & cancer · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Cancer: slaying the nine-headed Hydra.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shumei KatoCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, California, USA.
Ryosuke OkamuraCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, California, USA.
Jacob J AdashekDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Noor KhalidCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, California, USA.
Suzanna LeeCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, California, USA.
Van NguyenCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, California, USA.
Jason K SicklickCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, California, USA.
Razelle KurzrockCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, California, USA.
UC San Diego Health System · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Jesse Nodora · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
Targeting Drug-Resistant Cancer Stem Cell Niches of Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorR01CA226803 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SICKLICK, JASON KEITH · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
Investigation of DNA Damaging Agents in GIST with Metabolic DysfunctionR01FD006334 · FDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SICKLICK, JASON KEITH · 2019 to 2021
$1.5M
FDA HHS R01 FD006334NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100NCI NIH HHS R01 CA226803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDAlthough CDK4/6 inhibitors are an established treatment for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancers, their benefit in other malignancies remains limited.METHODSWe investigated factors associated with clinical outcomes from CDK4/6 inhibitor-based therapy among patients with G1/S phase cell-cycle alterations (CDK4/6 amplifications, CCND1/2/3 amplifications, or CDKN2A/B alterations).RESULTSOverall, 2457 patients with diverse solid tumors that underwent clinical-grade, next-generation sequencing (182-465 genes) and therapy outcome of (non-breast cancer) patients treated with matched CDK4/6 inhibitors were analyzed. G1/S phase cell-cycle alterations occurred in 20.6% (507 of 2457) of patients; 99% of those patients (n = 501) harbored ≥1 characterized co-alteration (median, 4; range, 0-24). In 40 patients with G1/S phase cell-cycle alterations given CDK4/6 inhibitors as part of their regimen, significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS) was observed when CDK4/6 inhibitor-based therapies matched a larger proportion of tumor alterations, often because CDK4/6 inhibitors were administered together with other drugs that were matched to genomic co-alterations, hence achieving a high matching score (high vs. low [≥50% vs. <50%] matching score, PFS, 6.2 vs. 2.0 months, P < 0.001 [n = 40] [multivariate]) and higher rate of stable disease ≥6 months or an objective response (57% vs. 21%, P = 0.048).CONCLUSIONIn summary, in cell-cycle-altered cancers, matched CDK4/6 inhibitors, as part of an individualized regimen targeting a majority of genomic alterations, was independently associated with longer PFS.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT02478931.FUNDINGJoan and Irwin Jacobs Fund, National Cancer Institute (P30 CA023100, R01 CA226803), and the FDA (R01 FD006334).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCyclin DCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p15Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16FemaleG1 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsGenes, p16HumansMaleMAP Kinase Signaling SystemMiddle AgedNeoplasmsCDK4 protein, humanCDK6 protein, humanCDKN2A protein, humanCDKN2B protein, humanCyclin DCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p15Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsCell cycleMolecular biologyOncology

Identifiers

PMID33427211
PMCPMC7821594
OpenAlexW3119099625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.