ArticleBJPsych open2021
Ketamine treatment for depression: qualitative study exploring patient views.
Article in BJPsych open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feeling safe: an empirical-ethical analysis of vulnerability in (es)ketamine treatment.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Barriers and Access to Care for Firefighters With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Seeking Ketamine-Assisted Therapy: A Qualitative Study.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2026Article
- PAINscape-Exploring patient experiences with ketamine for chronic neuropathic pain: A qualitative study.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2026Article
- Patients' Voices on Ketamine for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Narrative Review of Qualitative Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Trends and characteristics in ketamine use among US adults with and without depression, 2015-2022.Journal of affective disorders · 2025Article
- The Acceptability of Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy Amongst Mental Health Consumers: Utilising the Theory of Planned Behaviour.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Article
- The perspectives of patients with depression toward esketamine, and the influence of their medication adherence on their viewpoints: a Saudi cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Beliefs and Perceived Barriers Regarding Psychedelic-assisted Therapy in a Pilot Study of Service Members and Veterans With a History of Traumatic Brain Injury.Military medicine · 2023Article
- A systematic review of the print media representation of ketamine treatments for psychiatric disorders.BJPsych open · 2023Review
- Europium Nanoparticles-Based Fluorescence Immunochromatographic Detection of Three Abused Drugs in Hair.Toxics · 2023Article
- Holding on or letting go? Patient experiences of control, context, and care in oral esketamine treatment for treatment-resistant depression: A qualitative study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKetamine is a new and promising treatment for depression but comes with challenges to implement because of its potential for abuse.
aimsWe sought the views of patients to inform policy and practical decisions about the clinical use of ketamine before large-scale roll-out is considered.
methodThis qualitative study used three focus groups and three validation sessions from 14 patients with prior diagnoses of depression but no experience of ketamine treatment. Focus groups explored their views about clinical use of ketamine and the best way for ketamine to be administered and monitored. The qualitative data were analysed by three service-user researchers using thematic analysis.
resultsFive themes were generated: changing public perceptions, risks, monitoring, privacy and data protection, and practical aspects. Participants were conscious of the stigma attached to ketamine as a street drug and wanted better public education, and evidence on the safety of ketamine after long-term use. They felt that monitoring was required to provide evidence for ketamine's safe use and administration, but there were concerns about the misuse of this information. Practical aspects included discussions about treatment duration, administration and accessibility (for example who would receive it, under what criteria and how).
conclusionsPatients are enthusiastic about ketamine treatment but need more information before national roll-out. The wider societal impact of ketamine treatment also needs to be considered and patients need to be part of any future roll-out to ensure its success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.