Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33427084›Full record

ReviewGlobal public health2022

Health equity and health system strengthening - Time for a WHO re-think.

N Jensen, A H Kelly, M Avendano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Ethical Frameworks and Global Health: A Narrative Review of the "Leave No One Behind" Principle.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

N JensenDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, North East Wing, 40 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0835-6189
A H KellyDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, North East Wing, 40 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4658-2133
M AvendanoDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, North East Wing, 40 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4BG, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 204939/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pursuit of health equity is foundational to the global health enterprise. But while moral concerns over health inequities can galvanise political commitment, how such concerns can or should translate into practice remains less clear. This paper reviews evolving ways that equity goals have featured in key World Health Organization (WHO)-related policy documents, before discussing the heuristic value and empirical traction that the concept of equity can bring to the health system strengthening (HSS) agenda. We argue that while health equity is often presented as the overarching goal of HSS, in practice this is typically circumscribed to the provision of healthcare services. Although health

Indexed as

Health EquityGlobal HealthGovernment ProgramsHealth PolicyHumansPolicyWorld Health OrganizationEquityhealth systemssocial determinantssocial justiceWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID33427084
PMCPMC8820375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.