ArticleHuman gene therapy2021
Safe and Effective
Article in Human gene therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- CRISPR/nCas9-Edited CD34+ Cells Rescue Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA Fibroblasts Phenotype.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Restoring hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell function inMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Article
- Challenges and innovations in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: exploring bone marrow niches and new model systems.BMB reports · 2024Review
- Defining global strategies to improve outcomes in sickle cell disease: a Lancet Haematology Commission.The Lancet. Haematology · 2023Review
- Diverse Approaches to Gene Therapy of Sickle Cell Disease.Annual review of medicine · 2023Review
- Current approaches and potential challenges in the delivery of gene editing cargos into hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.Frontiers in genome editing · 2023Review
- Review
- CRISPR medicine for blood disorders: Progress and challenges in delivery.Frontiers in genome editing · 2022Review
- Nanoparticles targeting hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells: Multimodal carriers for the treatment of hematological diseases.Frontiers in genome editing · 2022Review
- Hematopoietic stem and progenitors cells gene editing: Beyond blood disorders.Frontiers in genome editing · 2022Review
- Genome editing in large animal models.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2021Review
- Understanding and overcoming adverse consequences of genome editing on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2021Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
On May 11, 2020, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Gates Foundation) held an exploratory expert scientific roundtable to inform an NIH-Gates Foundation collaboration on the development of scalable, sustainable, and accessible HIV and sickle cell disease (SCD) therapies based on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.