Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33427020›Full record

ArticleNursing ethics2021

Moral injury in healthcare professionals: A scoping review and discussion.

Anto Čartolovni, Minna Stolt, P Anne Scott, Riitta Suhonen

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing ethics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
71.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 361 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Association of Moral Injury and Healthcare Clinicians' Wellbeing: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. "Part of a cog, of a system; a system that's broken": social workers' experiences of moral injury in England.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  7. The Healer's Heartache: Reforming Medicine from the Rough Ground.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The biopsychosocial-spiritual impact on non-clinical health professionals who interact with traumatic and/or sensitive health data: A scoping review.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Resting-State Neural Signatures of Moral Injury: Associations With Rumination.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026
    Article
  19. Caring for Caregivers: System-Level Solutions to Moral Injury in Burn Teams.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Anto Čartolovni324714Catholic University of Croatia, Croatia; University of Hull, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9420-0887
Minna Stolt8058University of Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1845-9800
P Anne Scott8799National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5790-8066
Riitta Suhonen8058University of Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4315-5550
University of Turku · FIOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEUniversity of Hull · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Moral injury emerged in the healthcare discussion quite recently because of the difficulties and challenges healthcare workers and healthcare systems face in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Moral injury involves a deep emotional wound and is unique to those who bear witness to intense human suffering and cruelty. This article aims to synthesise the very limited evidence from empirical studies on moral injury and to discuss a better understanding of the concept of moral injury, its importance in the healthcare context and its relation to the well-known concept of moral distress. A scoping literature review design was used to support the discussion. Systematic literature searches conducted in April 2020 in two electronic databases, PubMed/Medline and PsychInfo, produced 2044 hits but only a handful of empirical papers, from which seven well-focused articles were identified. The concept of moral injury was considered under other concepts as well such as stress of conscience, regrets for ethical situation, moral distress and ethical suffering, guilt without fault, and existential suffering with inflicting pain. Nurses had witnessed these difficult ethical situations when faced with unnecessary patient suffering and a feeling of not doing enough. Some cases of moral distress may turn into moral residue and end in moral injury with time, and in certain circumstances and contexts. The association between these concepts needs further investigation and confirmation through empirical studies; in particular, where to draw the line as to when moral distress turns into moral injury, leading to severe consequences. Given the very limited research on moral injury, discussion of moral injury in the context of the duty to care, for example, in this pandemic settings and similar situations warrants some consideration.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PersonnelMoralsPandemicsStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticHumansCOVID-19ethicsmoral conflictmoral injurymoral integritypandemic

Identifiers

PMID33427020
PMCPMC8366182
OpenAlexW3119083154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.