Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33426992›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group2020

Photothermal therapies to improve immune checkpoint blockade for cancer.

Preethi B Balakrishnan, Elizabeth E Sweeney, Anvitha S Ramanujam, Rohan Fernandes

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Neuroblastoma-A Review of Combination Immunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Monoclonal Antibodies for Chronic Pain Treatment: Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Preethi B BalakrishnanThe George Washington Cancer Center, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Elizabeth E SweeneyThe George Washington Cancer Center, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Anvitha S RamanujamThe George Washington Cancer Center, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Rohan FernandesThe George Washington Cancer Center, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
George Washington University · US

Funding

Engineered Ensemble Nanoimmunotherapies for CancerR37CA226171 · NCI · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FERNANDES, ROHAN · 2019 to 2024
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA226171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) comprising monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against immune 'checkpoints', such as CTLA-4 and the PD1/PDL1 axis have dramatically improved clinical outcomes for patients with cancer. However, ICB by itself has failed to provide benefit in a wide range of solid tumors, where recurrence still occurs with high incidence. These poor response rates may be due to the therapeutic shortcomings of ICB; namely, a lack of cancer-specific cytotoxicity and ability to debulk tumors. To overcome these limitations, effective ICB therapy may require the combination with other complementary therapeutic platforms. Here, we propose that photothermal therapy (PTT) is an ideal therapeutic modality for combination with ICB because it can generate both tumor-specific cytotoxicity and immunogenicity. PTT elicits these specific effects because it is a localized thermal ablation technique that utilizes light-responsive nanoparticles activated by a wavelength-matched laser. While ICB immunotherapy alone improves cancer immunogenicity but does not generate robust antitumor cytotoxicity, nanoparticle-based PTT elicits targeted and controlled cytotoxicity but sub-optimal long-term immunogenicity. Thus, the two platforms offer complementary and potentially synergistic antitumor effects, which will be detailed in this review. We highlight three classes of nanoparticles used as agents of PTT (i.e., metallic inorganic nanoparticles, carbon-based nanoparticles and organic dyes), and illustrate the potential for nanoparticle-based PTT to potentiate the effects of ICB in preclinical models. Through this discussion, we aim to present PTT combined with ICB as a potent synergistic combination treatment for diverse cancer types currently refractory to ICB as well as PTT monotherapies.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalNeoplasmsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyPhotothermal TherapyAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorscancerimmune checkpoint blockadeimmunotherapynanoparticlePhotothermal therapythermal ablation

Identifiers

PMID33426992
PMCPMC7808273
OpenAlexW3120068381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.