Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33426806›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2021

Examination of the best head tilt angle to reduce the parotid gland dose maintaining a safe level of lens dose in whole-brain radiotherapy using the four-field box technique.

Hidetoshi Shimizu, Koji Sasaki, Takahiro Aoyama, Hiroyuki Tachibana, Hiroshi Tanaka, Yutaro Koide, Tohru Iwata, Tomoki Kitagawa, Takeshi Kodaira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hidetoshi ShimizuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6633-0964
Koji SasakiGraduate School of Radiological Technology, Gunma Prefectural College of Health Sciences, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Takahiro AoyamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8423-6509
Hiroyuki TachibanaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Hiroshi TanakaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Yutaro KoideDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Tohru IwataDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Tomoki KitagawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Takeshi KodairaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The parotid gland is recognized as a major-risk organ in whole-brain irradiation; however, the beam delivery from the left and right sides cannot reduce the parotid gland dose. The four-field box technique using a head-tilting device has been reported to reduce the parotid gland dose by excluding it from the radiation field. This study aimed to determine the appropriate head tilt angle to reduce the parotid gland dose in the four-field box technique. The bilateral, anterior, and posterior beams were set for each of ten patients. The orbitomeatal plane angle (OMPA) was introduced as an indicator that expresses the head tilt angle. Next, principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to understand the interrelationship between variables (dosimetric parameters of the lens and parotid gland and OMPA). In PCA, the angle between the OMPA vector and maximum lens dose or mean parotid gland dose vector was approximately opposite or close, indicating a negative or positive correlation [r = -0.627 (p < 0.05) or 0.475 (p < 0.05), respectively]. The OMPA that reduced the maximum lens dose to <10 Gy with a 95% confidence interval was approximately 14°. If the lens dose was not considered, the parotid gland dose could be reduced by decreasing the OMPA.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsParotid GlandBrainHeadHumansRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assistedparotid glandprophylactic cranial irradiationsmall cell lung cancerwhole brain

Identifiers

PMID33426806
PMCPMC7882111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.