Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33426594›Full record

ArticleBiomedical microdevices2021

An Oral-mucosa-on-a-chip sensitively evaluates cell responses to dental monomers.

Khanh L Ly, Seyed Ali Rooholghodos, Christopher Rahimi, Benjamin Rahimi, Diane R Bienek, Gili Kaufman, Christopher B Raub, Xiaolong Luo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical microdevices, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Engineered Tissue Models to Decode Host-Microbiota Interactions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Host-microbe-cancer interactions on-a-chip.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khanh L Ly *Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Catholic University of America, 620 Michigan Avenue NE, Washington, DC, 20064, USA.
Seyed Ali Rooholghodos *Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Catholic University of America, 620 Michigan Avenue NE, Washington, DC, 20064, USA.
Christopher RahimiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Catholic University of America, 620 Michigan Avenue NE, Washington, DC, 20064, USA.
Benjamin RahimiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Catholic University of America, 620 Michigan Avenue NE, Washington, DC, 20064, USA.
Diane R BienekADA Science & Research Institute, LLC, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Gili KaufmanADA Science & Research Institute, LLC, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Christopher B Raub *Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Catholic University of America, 620 Michigan Avenue NE, Washington, DC, 20064, USA. raubc@cua.edu.
Xiaolong Luo *Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Catholic University of America, 620 Michigan Avenue NE, Washington, DC, 20064, USA. luox@cua.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9939-2766
University of America · US

Funding

ANTIMICROBIAL AND REMINERALIZING COMPOSITES FOR CLASS V RESTORATIONSR01DE026122 · NIDCR · AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION · PI BIENEK, DIANE R · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
Heterogeneous synthetic microbiome constructed with biopolymer fluitrodesR15GM129766 · NIGMS · CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA · PI CHOY, JOHN SING, LUO, XIAOLONG · 2018 to 2018
$465k
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE026122NIGMS NIH HHS 1R15GM129766-01NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM129766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of human gingival cell responses to dental monomers is critical for the development of new dental materials. Testing standards have been developed to provide guidelines to evaluate biological functionality of dental materials and devices. However, one shortcoming of the traditional testing platforms is that they do not recapitulate the multi-layered configuration of gingiva, and thus cannot evaluate the layer-specific cellular responses. An oral mucosa-chip with two cell layers was previously developed as an alternative platform to assess the oral mucosa responses to dental biomaterials. The mucosa-chip consists of an apical keratinocyte layer attached to a fibroblast-embedded collagen hydrogel through interconnecting pores in a three-microchannel network. Here, cell responses in the mucosa-chip were evaluated against 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), a common monomer used in restorative and aesthetic dentistry. The response of mucosal cell viability was evaluated by exposing the chip to HEMA of concentrations ranging from 1.56 to 25 mM and compared to cells in conventional well-plate monoculture. The co-cultured cells were then stained and imaged with epifluorescence and confocal microscopy to determine the layer-specific responses to the treatment. Mucosa-chips were demonstrated to be more sensitive to assess HEMA-altered cell viability than well-plate cultures, especially at lower doses (1.56 and 6.25 mM). The findings suggest that the mucosa-chip is a promising alternative to traditional platforms or assays to test a variety of biomaterials by offering a multi-layered tissue geometry, accessible layer-specific information, and higher sensitivity in detecting cellular responses.

Indexed as

Lab-On-A-Chip DevicesMouth MucosaBiocompatible MaterialsCell SurvivalGingivaHumansMethacrylatesBiocompatible MaterialsMethacrylates2-hydroxyethyl methacrylateCell viabilityDental materials testingGingivaMucosa-on-a-chip

Identifiers

PMID33426594
PMCPMC8344876
OpenAlexW3121052130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.