Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33426567›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2021

How social is the cerebellum? Exploring the effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on the prediction of social and physical events.

Viola Oldrati, Elisabetta Ferrari, Niccolò Butti, Zaira Cattaneo, Renato Borgatti, Cosimo Urgesi, Alessandra Finisguerra

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cerebellar tDCS Modulates Corticocortical Functional Networks in a Regionally Specific Manner.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Social and emotional learning in the cerebellum.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cognitive predictors of Social processing in congenital atypical development.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Functional Segregation of the Human Cerebellum in Social Cognitive Tasks Revealed by TMS.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Viola OldratiScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Neuro-Oncological and Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Unit, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy. viola.oldrati@lanostrafamiglia.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7179-8767
Elisabetta FerrariScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Neuropsychiatry and Neurorehabilitation Unit, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4781-1367
Niccolò ButtiScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Neuropsychiatry and Neurorehabilitation Unit, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5511-4342
Zaira CattaneoDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7516-7508
Renato BorgattiIRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8165-4994
Cosimo UrgesiScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Neuropsychiatry and Neurorehabilitation Unit, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0572-1328
Alessandra FinisguerraScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Pasian di Prato, Udine, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1092-2936

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health GR-2016-02363640Italian Ministry of Health Ricerca Corrente 2020Italian Ministry of University and Research 2017N7WCLP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital or acquired cerebellum alterations are associated with a complex pattern of motor, cognitive and social disorders. These disturbances may reflect the involvement of the cerebellum in generating and updating the internal models that sub-serve-the prediction of sensory events. Here, we tested whether the cerebellar involvement in using contextual expectations to interpret ambiguous sensory sceneries is specific for social actions or also extends to physical events. We applied anodic, cathodic and sham cerebellar transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) to modulate the performance of an adult sample in two tasks requiring the prediction of social actions or moving shapes. For both tasks, in an earlier implicit-learning phase (familiarization), we manipulated the probability of co-occurrence between a particular action/shape and contextual elements, which could provide either strongly or moderately informative expectations. The use of these expectations was then tested when participants had to predict the unfolding of temporally occluded videos, in situations of perceptual uncertainty (testing). Results showed that in the testing, but not in the familiarization phase, cathodic as compared to anodic and sham ctDCS hindered participants' sensitivity in predicting actions embedded in strongly, but not moderately, informative contexts. Conversely, anodic as compared to sham ctDCS boosted the prediction of actions embedded in moderately, but not strongly, informative contexts. We observed no ctDCS effects for the shape prediction task, thus pointing to a specific involvement of the cerebellum in forming expectations related to social events. Our results encourage the exploration of rehabilitative effects of ctDCS in patients with social perception deficits.

Indexed as

Social InteractionTranscranial Direct Current StimulationCerebellumCognitionHumansLearningMalePredictive Value of TestsYoung AdultAction predictionCerebellumPredictive codingPriorsSocial cognitiontDCS

Identifiers

PMID33426567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.